FCC wants to kill burner phones by forcing telecoms to get all customers' IDs
189 points by berlianta 3 hours ago | 121 comments

bsimpson 2 hours ago
Here's the link to submit a comment to the FCC:

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filings/express

Ran a quick search and found a whole bunch of news articles, but nobody includes info that makes it easy to route your comment. Feels like the beginning of Hitchhiker's Guide:

> It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying Beware of the Leopard.

reply
mcmcmc 2 hours ago
This is the specific proposed rule to reference: https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-seeks-comment-enhanced-know...
reply
kogasa240p 60 minutes ago
Thank you
reply
user3939382 2 hours ago
Open to the possibility that I’m just cynical but my faith is very low that these comment processes are anything more than a regulatory requirement for the illusion of due diligence which legitimizes the actual corporate lobbying and security state actually making the policy.
reply
JumpCrisscross 4 minutes ago
You’re wrong. Even if the regulator ignores them, they allow third parties to bring a suit under the APA.
reply
pickleglitch 2 hours ago
They require your name and address, so they will have a nice database of anyone who dares voice an objection.
reply
mothballed 2 hours ago
I'm nearly certain commenting, at least from my monitoring of commenting on ATF rulemaking, achieves the opposite of what the commenters hope.

While there is ~zero chance that commenting can help you, it absolutely is used against you as their lawyers sharpen their claws by crowdsourcing possible sources of challenge and use your comments to predict them and determine how to undermine such positions.

reply
toast0 2 hours ago
Great. As if telecoms can be trusted with customers' id. AT&T left my name, address, social security etc in an improperly secured database for others to have, and they tried to open accounts with it; they had retained the information after I closed my account, and they denied the information was coming from them for years before they finally admitted it and gave us all a quarter to call someone who cares and a year of credit monitoring.
reply
downrightmike 51 minutes ago
And your pin is 1234
reply
garciasn 22 minutes ago
Same as their, Samsonite I was way off, luggage.
reply
t1234s 35 minutes ago
This is probably part of the larger scope of the system wanting to require ID to even boot a computer let alone connect to the internet.
reply
dkdbejwi383 3 hours ago
This is how it works in Australia, which means it's a pain for tourists as you need to provide a passport for ID and get it activated, as opposed to just grabbing one at an airport kiosk and being ready to go on your way to the taxi or train like most other places.
reply
MarkusWandel 8 minutes ago
Somewhat recently, tried to activate a SIM for a guest here in Canada, and while you could fill in anything you want for personal info, the only way to hook up (prepaid) billing was with a Canadian credit card number. Whoops. This was only for a month, so I put in mine and he reimbursed me in cash. Other carriers may still let you buy one-time payment cards for cash at retail; this one didn't.
reply
willhslade 3 minutes ago
I think this is where Airalo shines. I've used it while travelling and I think eSIMs, as annoying as they are, are the way.
reply
naturalmovement 3 hours ago
> like most other places

Much of EU requires ID for some time now. France is a bit strange, requires registration after 23 days or something. Germany, Italy, Spain it's basically impossible.

The US is rather unique in that it does not require registration.

reply
ivanmontillam 2 hours ago
Argentina doesn't also, you can just buy a SIM card off the newsstand.
reply
joxdosba 3 hours ago
Huh? At least in Germany, Spain and France all of the smaller shops fill in fake info without even asking.

EU countries have had these requirements for years and years and never moved to actually enforce them.

reply
naturalmovement 3 hours ago
I wasn't taking blatant fraud into account. I'm sure that's possible everywhere. I'd bet you can buy cigarettes without the tax stamps in the same shop too.

Last I traveled the shop required a passport or uploading one to get an eSIM ahead of time.

reply
joxdosba 2 hours ago
Sure, but if you’re a tourist in e.g. Barcelona trying to get a prepaid SIM, odds are the shopkeeper will not ask you for your ID despite being required to.

> Last I traveled the shop required a passport or uploading one to get an eSIM ahead of time.

Sounds like you went to a carrier boutique and not one of the million independent shops.

reply
naturalmovement 2 hours ago
I would think most tourists would trust a carrier-branded store over Honest Jochen's Tobacco Emporium where you may or may not get a working SIM after paying cash.
reply
joxdosba 2 hours ago
Trust? Sure. They’re still more likely to buy their prepaid SIM from the shop that also sells bongs, they are on every corner after all.
reply
lifestyleguru 2 hours ago
Not a good example. In Spain they notoriously demand id/passport and make photo or copy of it, they do it "for the police".
reply
joxdosba 2 hours ago
That’s the legal requirement yes, I’ve never seen a shop insist on it. Most of them have autofill scripts for the KYC forms.
reply
naturalmovement 2 hours ago
Isn't the main topic of discussion here a legal requirement?

If everyone ignores it then what's the fuss about?

reply
joxdosba 2 hours ago
I’m just pointing out that in Europe the equivalent legal requirement is widely ignored, the same won’t necessarily repeat in the US, but it might.
reply
LawnGnome 2 hours ago
Has this changed recently? I thought I heard about this several years ago, but the last 2-3 times I've visited (in the last couple of years) I've been able to pick up a prepaid SIM from Colesworth without any ID check.
reply
ibejoeb 50 minutes ago
It has been like that for at least 8 years, and probably longer. There are still stalls at airports, but you must provide ID.
reply
LawnGnome 48 minutes ago
Interesting. Seems like this isn't very consistently enforced, then.
reply
ibejoeb 44 minutes ago
You may have bought the sim card but never activated it. It's not the device itself that is restricted, just using it.
reply
dgellow 3 hours ago
I mean. It’s the same, you just have to show your passport and fill a form. It takes 1minute to get it done, you can do it on your way to the taxi if you want. Though e-sim are more practical now
reply
mothballed 2 hours ago
I wonder what exactly are they hoping to achieve then? Anything that can be filled out in 1 minute in a taxi can be spoofed with an extra 30 seconds on the dark net buying dark IDs. So this does less than zero for crime, actually encourages more of it, while doing what exactly? It's madness.
reply
nemomarx 2 hours ago
Who says anything about crime? the goal is just so they can associate phone numbers with id cards in some fashion right?

If they want to know what tourists are posting about their country that's good enough.

reply
voakbasda 2 hours ago
Like so many laws, nothing to do with stopping crime, but an obvious push to strip the populace of its rights.
reply
philistine 3 minutes ago
You do not have the right to a phone number without providing ID. If you're an American, those unwritten rights that come from other firm rights written down in laws and constitutions can always be argued, they're always being whittled down.

Rights for everyone are achieved through blood and toil, and if you truly want a right to anonymity and the digital tools necessary to achieve it, you will need blood and toil. Until then, we'll have to squeeze through fast developments that governments have yet to address.

reply
mothballed 2 hours ago
"Law enforcement" and national security is given as the verbatim headline justification when you reference Australia's Communication and Media Authority[] for rules on ID collection.

  Carriers and carriage service providers (CSPs) must help law enforcement and national security agencies.

  ...

  You must verify a customer's identity before you activate a prepaid mobile phone service. You can do this when the customer buys the service or when they try to activate it. The Determination on identity checks for prepaid mobiles lists the ways you can check a customer's identity.
Unfortunately I can't dig up the original debate from 1997 on the Telecommunications Act when the requirement appears to have been introduced. Would be shocked if it did not include similar language from the representatives shilling the requirement, though.

[] https://www.acma.gov.au/support-law-enforcement-and-security...

reply
NoMoreNicksLeft 3 hours ago
What problem were they hoping to solve with that legislation?
reply
stackskipton 2 hours ago
Most of time it's billed as law enforcement fighting tool. If people can't have anonymous cell phones, once you capture one criminal phone number, you can quickly look at who they call and since they can't be burners, you figure out the criminal network.

Also, if you have restrictions of speech in the country, it's great way to de anonymize any speech government says is illegal.

reply
logicchains 3 hours ago
The problem of citizens having anonymous internet connectivity.
reply
chopin 2 hours ago
That's an illusion. Two days of location data and you can pin down the owner pretty well.

I thought about getting a SIM when Germany was about to introduce ID requirements. I quickly realized this being a moot point.

reply
rusk 2 hours ago
The free anonymous internet was only ever a ruse to get people to use it so the CIA could spy on them. DARPA, folks, created a “free as in beer” global surveillance network and we all bought it.

Not that we didn’t get anything in return but the idea that the worlds foremost military industrial complex just gave this to the world because they loved us is laughable.

reply
redsocksfan45 3 hours ago
[dead]
reply
mc32 3 hours ago
Don’t eSIMs solve this problem for tourists?
reply
naturalmovement 3 hours ago
Apple — and now Google — have "solved" this problem for the government by removing physical SIM slots in US iPhones.
reply
TylerE 2 hours ago
Thus eSIM
reply
ezfe 25 minutes ago
eSIM doesn't change local laws around cell phones - it's not magic.
reply
RankingMember 22 minutes ago
Yep, they'll still prompt for the info.
reply
izacus 14 minutes ago
In what way? Activating it still needs KYC.
reply
vfclists 2 hours ago
Doesn't an eSIM link the SIM to the phone's IMEI which is usually logged somewhere?
reply
ezfe 25 minutes ago
Yes, eSIM doesn't really change this conversation
reply
nickphx 3 hours ago
Only if you do not require voice service.
reply
iammrpayments 2 hours ago
Had to buy one of these SMS activation services from a guy in Nigeria using a memecoin because claude decided to ban my account because they didn’t like my credit card brand and Claude requires sms activation for new accounts.

Guess these guys are going to make more money in the near future.

reply
XYen0n 2 hours ago
After the implementation of SIM card real-name registration in China, scam calls can accurately state your personal information.
reply
Keyb0ardWarri0r 2 hours ago
I'm always surprised how bad ideas spread faster than good ideas among our rulers. Here is a map of countries where an ID is required (or not) https://www.comparitech.com/blog/vpn-privacy/sim-card-regist...
reply
giancarlostoro 2 hours ago
I wish they would kill spam calling and texting instead.
reply
dawnerd 36 minutes ago
Been getting two a day, clearly some ai voice robo call. We have all this technology yet these spam calls still persist.
reply
brushfoot 2 hours ago
No more anonymous driving, thanks to Flock. Soon, no more anonymous calls, thanks to the FCC.

Your bank already knows everything about you; why not your operating system, too?

Soon your ISP will only let you online if your OS sends them the "right" information: your government ID.

We should also abolish cash while we're at it. The government needs to know every purchase you've ever made, no exceptions.

Of course, then we should tear down used bookstores. They're the biggest risk of all. Anyone can walk in and pick up pieces of paper that teach them dangerous ideas. Other religions. Philosophies. Poetry. How to make things.

What we really need is a nation of drones walking to and fro in the image of our rulers, thinking their thoughts, practicing their religions, and parroting their words. It's the only way to be truly safe.

reply
grim_io 2 hours ago
Worse, we are becoming a burden.

The Thiels of the world are already past wanting an obedient consumer.

They don't need us for the utopia they imagine for themselves.

reply
mystraline 2 hours ago
It was a terrible scattered movie, but they want Elysium.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elysium_(film)

reply
ceejayoz 2 hours ago
No, Elysium still had all the desperate poor people. That's not the end goal.
reply
gslepak 2 hours ago
They want to scan your soul. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8v5HLLkgo5A
reply
xerox13ster 2 hours ago
They want the future setting of Unanimity in Cloud Atlas. Even that might be too much of an underclass.
reply
nosioptar 2 hours ago
Can even go to the bodega on foot anonymously, too many of my neighbors have ring cameras pointed at the street.
reply
markstos 2 hours ago
Flock is being rejected in a number of cities, thanks to citizens.
reply
roysting 51 minutes ago
I am quite confident that there will eventually in any of those cities be some kind of major mass casualty type event that will be attributed to that rejection. I don’t hope for it and am sorry for all of humanity for what we are allowing to seemingly inevitably come about, but here we are; like cattle being herded to the feed lot. “But they’re saying they’ll feed you”, you will hear, “they don’t mean you ill. You should stop being a conspiracy theorists. This food is good.”
reply
collinmcnulty 32 minutes ago
We’ll see how it goes, but we also have suits like this that push back on that narrative as if you’re going to say your tech protects against a certain kind of tragedy, and that tragedy actually happens and you didn’t protect against it, maybe you bear some liability.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/school-shooting-...

reply
cucumber3732842 2 hours ago
Every step of the way enabled by useful idiots who think that because each incremental step applies more/cheaper government violence to some class of petty deviants they don't like that it is worth doing even if the overall trajectory created by the sum total of the steps is bad. Selfish jerks.
reply
clint 2 hours ago
> We should also abolish cash while we're at it.

Why do you think all the rich people (and by extension the oligarchy running this country) are pushing Crypto?

reply
roysting 40 minutes ago
I don’t think pointing that out will get very far. People didn’t notice when “democracy” was pushed by the same people, in direct contradiction to the Constitution. “Democracy” was the lynchpin to neutralize the Constitution and usher in oligarchic control again, just like digital/programmable currency will complete the pivot of slavery into a total and global system. Why only enslave a few people when you can enslave all people with smoke and mirrors that will make them cheer on their own deception with amusement.
reply
rirze 3 hours ago
Fundamentally un-American.

That being said, many countries across the world already do this to eliminate burner phones. And many messaging apps require a phone number anyways so this basically locks down anonymous messaging through a phone.

reply
rockskon 2 hours ago
Well - it's not exactly a surprise that all these non-American countries engage in un-American practices.

It's much more concerning when said practices are undertaken by the U.S.

Just because other countries do something isn't a justification to bring the practice into the U.S. despite that being a justification used with increasing prevalence these days.

reply
cwillu 2 hours ago
American exceptionalism was always a lie; name an “un-American” practice, and I'll show you a piece of American foreign policy.
reply
brightball 2 hours ago
Violations of the US Bill of Rights.

Yes they occur. Yes the US does it. Every violation of it should have lost in court already but courts have a way of interpreting things based on their beliefs rather than original intent.

reply
mindslight 2 hours ago
A lie, or an ideal to try and live up to, depending on the context. In the context of discussing liberty-destroying privacy invasions it's an ideal, and we should not be so quick to dismiss it.
reply
cucumber3732842 60 minutes ago
>Just because other countries do something isn't a justification to bring the practice into the U.S.

I need to know whether these other countries are rich western europe before I know whether to agree with you or to cook up some snide rebuttal.

Joking, obviously. And by "joking" I mean mocking a specific type of person and set of beliefs that is who is a) bad b) too common around here.

reply
axus 2 hours ago
Free, anonymous political speech is the bedrock of American freedom. Also, guns
reply
em-bee 2 hours ago
there still are a bunch of viable messaging apps/services that work without a phone number:

matrix, wire, deltachat, threema, maybe jabber/xmpp (depends on their support of encryption). any others?

reply
kgwxd 2 hours ago
> many messaging apps require a phone number

But not all, so what's the actual point?

reply
rirze 2 hours ago
If a messaging app ever gets the attention of government regulators, it must succumb to this verification.

I don't know any way to avoid this.

reply
a34729t 36 minutes ago
We should allow privateers to go after spammers, and get the seized assets. And spammer is then tortured appropriately. Satan could run a successful single issue campaign on this in the most religious state in the US.
reply
9cb14c1ec0 2 hours ago
I expect the FCC to adopt this rule, and I also expect it to be challenged in court, on the basis that there are many other approaches to fighting spam calls that the FCC has not tried, but are much less intrusive.
reply
ryanisnan 2 hours ago
I hope you're right. I am not informed - is this typically how these decisions get challenged?
reply
9cb14c1ec0 15 minutes ago
There are two ways to challenge FCC decisions. There is the upfront approach where a business whose operations are harmed by an FCC decision sues to block the decision. Then there is the approach where said business announces their non-compliance and dares the FCC to sue them. The FCC does not have criminal charging authority, so it has to rely on courts to enforce compliance. See the Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T case that just wrapped up at the Supreme Court.
reply
functionmouse 2 hours ago
does nothing to fight spam; only polices lawful users

they call that "anarcho-tyranny"

reply
giantg2 2 hours ago
Maybe a way around this is for intermediary companies to own the phone that happens to have service and then lease the phone.
reply
voakbasda 2 hours ago
And with that suggestion, a clause is being added to close that loophole….
reply
giantg2 2 hours ago
So it would be illegal to lend a phone to anyone, even just for one call?
reply
garyfirestorm 3 hours ago
Isn’t this already a requirement? Can you really buy a burner phone/sim without providing identifying information?
reply
tracedddd 3 hours ago
not at all, it’s easy to buy cash only tracphone, mint, boost, etc. and there are plenty of explicit anonymous providers such as phreeli.

That said, I don’t think its a problem whatsoever and we shouldn’t have laws restricting it.

reply
downrightmike 27 minutes ago
the only solution is to upgrade the phone system to require ID, but that would cost billions to AT&T, so that ain't gonna happen
reply
hstaab 3 hours ago
T-Mobile prepaid accounts for example
reply
olyjohn 3 hours ago
You can just walk in there with cash and walk out with a fully activated SIM without them asking for ID?
reply
dgellow 2 hours ago
Correct
reply
sgt 56 minutes ago
Yes, I recall doing that. I'm a foreigner but I was in the US on vacation. Went to T-Mobile, so easy to get a SIM card.
reply
Zigurd 2 hours ago
I used to buy test phones for software testing at a bodega where they had a laundry basket full of phones, and they would sell prepaid SIMs no questions asked.
reply
dgellow 2 hours ago
In the US you can buy a SIM card and activate without providing any information at the airport. At least in NYC. I was really surprised the first time
reply
kgwxd 2 hours ago
Why were you surprised?
reply
ImJamal 50 minutes ago
Not who you were responding to, but most of the western world requires IDs already. The US is an outlier on this issue.
reply
kayo_20211030 9 minutes ago
I don't think that's true. At least not in the European countries I visit.
reply
kotaKat 2 hours ago
Back in the late 2000s-early 2010s you could grab some Verizon bubble pack flip phones and just dial an activation string on the handset itself and it'd set up a new phone number for you and you'd just have to go add airtime with a prepaid card or credit card without having to provide anything.

Some of the LTE tablets even powered up and put you into a walled garden with data (heh, DNS tunneling worked out of it) to let you sign up for a mobile plan out of the box.

When I did some activations with PagePlus with an actual dealer-level account, it cost me nothing to activate a 'customer' handset and the only info I had to provide on the activation screens was the phone's serial number and the requested ZIP/area code for activation.

And fine, okay, the FCC will force American telecoms to require IDs, but nothing's stoping Redtea Mobile's foreign eSIMs from roaming into the US for data connections. You're just one eSIM global roaming provider away from bypassing all of it!

reply
aaomidi 3 hours ago
This is the pathway Iran is using to provide tiered internet btw.

Just putting it out there on how quickly this tech turned against the population.

reply
rusk 3 hours ago
They’ll get around to guns eventually …
reply
Bender 4 minutes ago
That's Canada right now. The US is observing how that plays out.
reply
greenavocado 2 hours ago
They're already trying to regulate the shape of guns to effectively outlaw everything but the bullet.
reply
rusk 2 hours ago
Hopefully they tax th bejeesus out of bullets too. Who was the comedian “imma gona pop a cap in yo ass, but first imma set up a layaway”
reply
fridder 2 hours ago
Chris Rock. And honestly probably the easiest way for gun control
reply
bigbuppo 54 minutes ago
This sounds like a great thing for people that beat their domestic partners. Make it harder for their victims to escape.
reply
vfclists 2 hours ago
It was only a matter of time.

The real issue is whether government's should have the right to metadata or the content of remote communications.

Government's don't claim the right to monitor face to face communications so why should they have the right to do so for remote communications.

reply
downrightmike 48 minutes ago
They don't have that right, that's why Ben Franklin set up the USPS
reply
StepBroBD 2 hours ago
US of A’s Chinafication letsgooooooo
reply
mrsssnake 2 hours ago
Regardless of this, I see phone network as a legacy thing that in perfect world should already be replaced with lightweight upgradeable calling protocol over IPv6.
reply
fc417fc802 2 hours ago
This would apply equally to said IP calling network since you'd need a SIM card to access the tower interesting strewn across the country either way.
reply
reaperducer 2 hours ago
Good luck with this.

You can't make the desk clerk in a ghetto cell phone store care.

I say this speaking as someone who has a T-Mobile account under the name George Washington with a Valley Forge, Pennsylvania address.

reply
standardUser 3 hours ago
The Trump administration has been working overtime trying to build databases of people in this country. Leaving no stone unturned, legal or otherwise. I vaguely remember a time when American conservatives were against precisely this, often as a first principle. Maybe that's just an idealized memory on my part.
reply
kgwxd 2 hours ago
Spoiler: They were never against it, just biding their time.
reply
ethagnawl 2 hours ago
The American conservatives who can afford to be are effectively exempted. When they're not flying around on private jets, the ownership and metadata created by their cars, phones, etc. are obfuscated by layers of shell corporations.

The other ones are simple and/or deluded and think these sorts of policies won't ever come for _them_. (To their credit, under the current regime they're actually correct about that to a certain extent.)

reply
throwaway27448 3 hours ago
We're already forced into the credit bureaus. Into traffic cameras. Into using credit cards and banks. The idea the state would let us actually say things online anonymously (or to each other) is completely unrealistic: we must be tagged and tracked through our lifecycle.
reply
onetokeoverthe 51 minutes ago
[dead]
reply
sonorous_sub 3 hours ago
[flagged]
reply
Terr_ 3 hours ago
I want to believe this is just a Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy reference [0]... but I fear that might be too-optimistic.

[0] The profession of Telephone Sanitiser on planet Golgafrincham.

reply
josefritzishere 3 hours ago
Seems like classic regulatory overreach.
reply
2OEH8eoCRo0 2 hours ago
Good. Telecoms should have a duty to know who uses their networks.
reply
tclancy 2 hours ago
Let’s have your name and address then, citizen. Posters have a right to know who is commenting.
reply
nancyminusone 2 hours ago
The person using the network is the one who put a quarter in the payphone.
reply
bebeidjdkrjrjr 2 hours ago
It makes sense. If you are member of state supported terroeist group (antiva, mosab, alwuaide) just ask your sponsors for sims directly. Non state groups should not have access!
reply