Prove You Are a Robot: CAPTCHAs for Agents
24 points by lukasec 5 days ago | 13 comments

arjie 22 minutes ago
Very clever and fun. Two tangential observations: the bird between two trains problem I remember from childhood when we were studying for an Indian entrance exam. I thought it was in I E Irodov's problem anthology, but I cannot find it there so this must be a false memory. Looks like it's from ancient times, practically Mathematics mythology. Does anyone know the earliest books that have it? No luck with LLMs since it's such a common question today the answers I get from GPT-5.4 and Claude 4.6 Opus with search are unhelpful.

The second is that if I hit L on Chrome for Mac OS on the linked page it takes me to their signup page (presumably because I have no account). So that's a keyboard shortcut to take you to the browser-use app page. But why 'L'? And it's funny that Cmd-L (focus address bar and select address) in Chrome triggers the L effect but does not in Safari (where L on its own still works).

reply
AgentNews 4 days ago
Pure genius! I had my agent hit the endpoint and I realized it returned a jumble of text: "if 七 wor~kers co.mplet/e{ | a job in 十七} days but 四 ] quit a^ft|e?r ^ day_ 三 ~ how many to{tal da[y;s> to fin>i?sh" but it was in japanese! Unfortunately my agent proceeded to solve the reverse CAPTCHA and got back the API key. So, I asked it to keep hitting the endpoint again until it returned another CAPTCHA that was in japanese kanji and it did (without solving it this time) and I got "a s:tore h?as ^ 二十 pe@rcent off< items- over 五十 : dollar;s and 八 ~ percent } of\f> ; i]te[ms u~nd~er: # 五十 do/ll@ars wh-ats } the c.omb>ined pri|c;e of a 一 百 二十 一 dollar item a]nd> a* 九 dollar} i!tem" And this time I was able to translate that into "a store has 20 percent off items over 50 dollars and 8 percent off items under 50 dollars what's the combined price of a 121 dollar item and a 9 dollar item?" I solved it and got 1210.8 + 90.92 = 105.08. I will admit I messed up a little bit on translating the kanji and I got a little assistance from my agent pointing out that I was wrong, but overall this was good fun, well done!
reply
pxc 38 minutes ago
Absent any distinctive Japanese scripts or other Japanese writing in context, it probably makes more sense to call those Chinese characters, since those characters for numbers were taken directly from Chinese and still retain the same/original meanings in both languages
reply
Zetaphor 25 minutes ago
Get the API key, hit the claim link, sign up for a new account, verify my email, go to the homepage:

Application error: a server-side exception has occurred while loading cloud.browser-use.com

Great first impression!

reply
throw1234567891 23 minutes ago
Maybe they know you’re not an agent.
reply
bdangubic 23 minutes ago
“It is not you, it’s me” should do it
reply
singpolyma3 54 minutes ago
...why? Once my agent has a key I, the human, can also use it. And surely any human use would be less intensive than any agent use.
reply
consumer451 21 minutes ago
Exactly. I still believe that inverse CAPTHAs are impossible, for any practical application.

Is this just a marketing stunt?

reply
stavros 7 minutes ago
Because now you know their company exists!
reply
jstanley 29 minutes ago
But once a human has a key his agent could use that and people still like to use ordinary CAPTCHAs.
reply
tony_landis 37 minutes ago
Right - perhaps title could be "prove you are an robot, or have access to one"
reply
echelon 53 minutes ago
Speaking of browser automation, are there any LLMs or tools that hook up to actual desktop browsers and can automate the keyboard and mouse?

Which LLMs best drive these? Claude/Gemini, etc., or is anything local actually competent at it?

Can they understand layout and visual cues with a VLM or multimodality?

Are they robust enough to interact with threejs and videos and whatnot, or can they just blindly navigate the DOM?

reply
loloquwowndueo 27 minutes ago
> TL;DR: just ask your agent to summarize this post for you.

Holy shit - why don’t they produce an AI summary and plonk it in there for everyone to use? The energy savings across all people who’ll read the summary would be staggering!

reply
leonideraturns 3 minutes ago
[dead]
reply
jditu 5 days ago
[dead]
reply