NIST scientists create 'any wavelength' lasers
100 points by rbanffy 4 hours ago | 47 comments

evo 3 minutes ago
I wonder if this is a nuclear proliferation risk--could it be used for AVLIS/SILEX?
reply
adzm 2 hours ago
Everyone talking about magenta and brown, but you can see an illusory color right now even without lasers! https://dynomight.net/colors/ behold, some kind of hyper-turquoise
reply
jcul 33 minutes ago
The whole idea of colour and light frequency is fascinating.

These are just frequencies of light, but the subjective experience of them is so much more.

And the whole thing of my perception of "red" or what I call "red" could be very different to someone else's subjective perception. But we would both call it red and associate it with the same thing, fire, love, heat, danger etc.

reply
awesome_dude 25 minutes ago
But also - colours don't exist without a name

eg. Before Orange, there was only shades of yellow or reds

reply
huflungdung 6 minutes ago
[dead]
reply
junon 2 hours ago
For those not seeing it or only seeing a little, stare at it for a while then shake your head (or your phone) just a bit.
reply
marzell 50 minutes ago
Also there are other variants and tricks around this for other colors as well https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impossible_color
reply
spaqin 6 minutes ago
That's most certainly good news (depending on the final cost) for ion trapping quantum computing - the wavelength of the laser they require to trap an ion depends on the molecule chosen, and most setups are expensive, finicky and difficult to calibrate, or sometimes messy if it's a dye laser.
reply
mapt 2 hours ago
Is there a single person here interested in photonic computing that wants to explain to the class if there's any "there" there?
reply
nine_k 2 hours ago
Immediately:

* You can pack many more different colors into fiber optic communication lines. Every color carries a few tens of GHz in modulation, but the carrier light is in hundreds of THz; there's a ton of bandwidth not used between readily available colors.

* You can likely do interesting molecular chemistry by precisely adjusting laser light to the energy levels of particular bonds / electrons.

* Maybe you can precisely target particular wavelengths / absorption bands for more efficient laser cutting and welding, if these adjustable lasers can be made high-power.

reply
suzzer99 2 hours ago
* Concert lasers just got a lot cooler.
reply
db48x 2 hours ago
It’s like any other fundamental research: you don’t know how much it’s worth until people start using it to solve real problems. This is something that is literally impossible to guess ahead of time. The most abstract mathematical techniques could turn into a trillion–dollar industry (number theory begat RSA encryption which now underpins _everything_ we do).

But I will say that precise control of laser wavelength is critical to today’s communication technologies. I doubt their new techniques will be useless.

reply
QQ00 17 minutes ago
Hopefully the billions money in AI will find some of its to turn this into real life applications. AI inference would love some more faster more efficient communication.

I mean, Photonic computing already got the attention of these big tech companies.

reply
topspin 2 hours ago
There is there there...

The substance is they've created a way to fabricate a device that can make the optical frequencies they wish. That is useful: it means a designer isn't limited to frequencies that are economic to generate with existing techniques, which is a constraint that lasers currently struggle with: low cost, compact, efficient laser sources (the kind that fit on a chip, and are fabricated by cost effective processes,) only exist for a limited number of frequencies.

The story is typical tech journalism pabulum, but the underlying paper does discuss efficiency. It's about what you'd expect: 35 mW -> 6 mW @ 485 nm, for example.

An obvious use case is multimode fiber communication: perhaps this makes it possible to use more frequencies for greater bandwidth and/or make the devices cheaper/smaller/more efficient. But there are other, more exotic things one might do when some optical frequency that was previously uneconomic becomes feasible to use at scale.

reply
criticalfault 2 hours ago
I wonder if this could also work for (e)uv
reply
dado3212 2 hours ago
I think it's more relevant for quantum computing. The ions we choose for ion trap quantum computers are in part due to what wavelengths are excitable by modified telecom lasers, because they're the wavelengths that are easiest to produce and where the most research/stability/miniaturization has been focused. If the laser wavelength is configurable to this degree then it no longer becomes a constraint, and maybe you can choose single ions with different characteristics.
reply
2ndorderthought 2 hours ago
Depends on the cost. We already have variable wavelength lasers. We have had them for years. They are currently expensive, large, and not the easiest things to control electronically.

I have an application in mind for this technology outside of photonic computing. Again, it depends entirely on price, tunability, bandwidth of the profile, etc. My understanding of the photocomputing field is limited but I never thought the major issues were wavelength related? Maybe someone can educate me.

If anyone wants to send me one of these I would be pumped.

reply
brcmthrowaway 2 hours ago
There's a lot of people here with esoteric knowledge of lasers, because they're generally incredible devices (along with masers). Someone should be able to comment.

I wish we had a large laser manufacturing ability in the West. I would say 95% of lasers of all kinds are manufactured in China.

reply
SilentM68 2 hours ago
[flagged]
reply
himata4113 21 minutes ago
since the light range is so high, technically speaking as the technology improves does that mean we could end up sending petabytes a second over a single fiber optic core?
reply
jagged-chisel 32 minutes ago
The "shrinking" circle: I did as asked and clicked the image to see the animation. I saw no shrinking. My eyes did fatigue and I saw the border between the red and green become a blurred gradient.

What should I have experienced?

reply
deepsun 25 minutes ago
State for longer. It starts shrinking only after a minute.
reply
deepsun 24 minutes ago
Would I finally be able to see bright brown?
reply
nine_k 10 minutes ago
It's called orange. Much like bright gray is called white, and bright teal is called turquoise.
reply
jcims 2 hours ago
Can each device vary the color or is it fixed based on how it’s built? Seems the latter?
reply
2ndorderthought 38 minutes ago
I believe you are right.
reply
aftbit 2 hours ago
Cool, can I get a "proper" yellow diode laser from this? What's the efficiency look like?
reply
cheschire 2 hours ago
Yes but can it do any color a mantis shrimp would like?

https://theoatmeal.com/comics/mantis_shrimp

reply
Tade0 55 minutes ago
The Mantis Shrimp most likely sees very much like us (or birds, snakes), it's just that its brain is too small to integrate signals from just three types of cones, so it evolved a whole rainbow of cones.
reply
JumpCrisscross 53 minutes ago
Huh. Anywhere you'd suggest I can read more about this?
reply
__MatrixMan__ 2 hours ago
I'll take one in gamma please.
reply
Retro_Dev 60 minutes ago
A gamma wavelength handheld laser would be cool; "and on this petri dish, we see a dot of cells instantaneously develop cancer"
reply
guzfip 51 minutes ago
Very cool stuff. I regret wasting my life in software when I see other fields still doing interesting work.
reply
analog8374 2 hours ago
can they do microwave?

if you do the exact right color you can make certain things melt very precisely.

reply
Aboutplants 46 minutes ago
An application that came to mind is tunneling (through rock and earth). You could absolutely tune the wavelength to whatever material your drilling through absorbs best, to help ease and speed. Would need a good amount of energy but I could see that utilized in some fashion in the next 10-20 years
reply
BigTTYGothGF 2 hours ago
reply
analog8374 57 minutes ago
thanks, I'm familiar. But it doesn't answer my question.
reply
jiveturkey 2 hours ago
But can it produce magenta?
reply
ivanjermakov 2 hours ago
Not every color has a corresponding wavelength, rather a combination of wavelengths.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_vision

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIE_1931_color_space

reply
dnnddidiej 2 hours ago
Magenta is the Doom of colour lasers by the look of it.
reply
staplung 2 hours ago
What if I like magenta? Or brown?
reply
zamadatix 2 hours ago
Pedantry for pedantry, you're in luck as the title says they created 'any wavelength lasers' not 'any wavelength laser' so you can make any such combos you like rather than the fixed set now (if true) :p.
reply
dullcrisp 2 hours ago
Can I interest you in indigo or violet? Or a nice orange?
reply
dnnddidiej 2 hours ago
Genuine q: how close can you get to magenta with the rainbow?
reply
nine_k 2 hours ago
What we call "magenta" is the sensation of both red and blue color-sensitive cells in the eye being excited at the same time. There's no single wavelength that produces this effect (unlike e.g. yellow). The closes you can get is violet, which looks faint to the eye.

A rainbow gives you both red and blue; mute everything else, and you'll get magenta. That's what magenta pigments do when illuminated by white light (which is a rainbow scrambled).

reply
dyauspitr 55 minutes ago
Saying a wavelength doesn’t do it doesn’t make any sense. If you can perceive it visually, a wavelength is doing it.
reply
nine_k 41 minutes ago
Two wavelengths do it; one does not suffice. It's like a perfect fifth can not one note.
reply
dyauspitr 39 minutes ago
The interference is a wavelength too. Maybe not pure but it is one. Afaik they cannot be interpreted as two separate wavelengths and then “brain combined” when the aperture (the retina) is so small.
reply
redsocksfan45 38 minutes ago
[dead]
reply
redsocksfan45 41 minutes ago
[dead]
reply
compass_copium 2 hours ago
Not very! This is on the "line of purples".

Here's a nice visualization of color perception (there are more modern ones, but we used the 1931 color space when I was working in the field). The horseshoe shape on the outside is the single wavelength colors.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIE_1931_color_space

reply