Used La Marzocco machines are coveted by cafe owners and collectors
53 points by mitchbob 4 days ago | 86 comments
https://archive.ph/afj75

tmoertel 11 hours ago
Before you spend many thousands of dollars on a machine better suited to a coffee shop, consider getting a minimalist lever machine.

I have (and love) my little Cafelat Robot [1]. It is small, draws no electricity, and relies upon my practiced hands to push preheated water through the coffee puck. There is nothing to get between me and the experience of making great espresso. I can feel the pressure, I can hear the stream of espresso, I can effortlessly adjust the flow in response to what the extraction is telling my senses.

Instead of a button press, pulling a shot is now a tactile experience that engages the senses. When the pull is done, I am primed to enjoy the results.

Yes, before getting an expensive commercial-style machine, consider what’s on the other end of the spectrum. Full manual has its benefits, both practical and aesthetic.

Plus, the money you will save will let you buy a better grinder. And that makes all the difference.

[1] http://www.cafelat.com/robot.html

reply
jperras 2 hours ago
> Before you spend many thousands of dollars on a machine better suited to a coffee shop, consider getting a minimalist lever machine.

Agreed. I have a Pavoni Europiccola, and it's made approximately ~11,000 espresso shots (about half of those ended up as milk-based beverages). It makes excellent coffee, and I live in a place where there are a _lot_ of good coffee places around to compare to.

The maintenance is something I do myself, with a few small & inexpensive tools, and a few gaskets I need to replace. The machine will likely outlive me, which is a rare thing to say these days.

reply
riknos314 2 hours ago
I agree but for different reasons. As a hardcore light/ultralight roast coffee nerd, I often recommend 'soup shots' over espresso. I've never owned an espresso setup, but the "soup shots" I've pulled with a $45 oxo brewer absolutely are in the ballpark of the best espresso shots I've had from the same roasts brewed with a traditional machine.
reply
neutronicus 9 hours ago
The practical benefit is having basically zero parts.

We got a Flair manual espresso maker after our Gaggia Classic crapped out after a year (hard water buildup, probably). I de-scaled, replaced some parts, still didn't work.

reply
plugger 5 hours ago
You've got to disassemble the boiler and remove the scale from there. I run a Gaggia Classic at home with really hard water and my machine literally stopped flowing due to scale buildup. Once I fully pulled it apart and scraped all the scale out of the inside of the boiler it started running flawlessly.

https://greatinfusions.com/blog/great-infusions-coffee-blog/...

reply
tortilla 11 hours ago
I have the same and love it. Another bonus of the Cafelat is no microplastics in my hot coffee. :)
reply
nightski 2 hours ago
They are fun but at the end of the day the deal breakers are "preheated water" and no steamed milk without more machines/gadgets. Kind of kills the entire point. That said, there are more advanced lever machines that have boilers built in.
reply
Affric 2 hours ago
No milk though
reply
keiferski 11 hours ago
Or just get a Moka pot, which is what most Italians use at home anyway. You can get a decent one for $30-50.
reply
zeech 10 hours ago
Moka pots don't make espresso though. True espresso requires ~9 bars of pressure to make. Moka pots can create at max 1.5 bars (though optimally it would hover between 0.5 and 1 bar).

So while they make very good, rich, full-bodied coffee, it's just not espresso.

reply
foobarian 3 hours ago
Not to detract from your point but the Bialettis also let you make a great cafecito
reply
SecretDreams 2 hours ago
It may not be true espresso, but I will ask my Nona every day for an espresso made from her probably 30 year old bialetti. When I'm drinking Moka, it's more about the vibes anywho.
reply
ButlerianJihad 2 hours ago
> a tactile experience that engages the senses

> make sure you have a good grinder first

The mercurial success of Hot Dog on a Stick has taught us that the choices of uniform and workers are factors!

reply
comrade1234 10 hours ago
When I moved to Europe years ago from the USA I was trying to decide if I wanted an all-in-one or an old-style arm one like you link (they were bigger though with lots of brass and just one arm). I ultimately went with the all-in-one (with ceramic grinders) because I realized I was so tired of grinding my coffee, packing it in, waiting for the espresso maker to warm up, having to stand there while the pump runs (I know this step is different), take the filter off and empty the grounds... if I needed to make 5 coffees for guests it was a big long ordeal. But my Italian all-in-one is super convenient but expensive but worth it. It's been twenty years now and I had to services just once. Select what I want to make, go off to my computer to login while it grinds the coffee, makes the coffee, go pick it up. Simple.
reply
tmoertel 6 hours ago
What machine did you get?

For what it is worth, I realized that superautos could make good espresso when in Italy in 2000 and got consistently good shots from the commercial superautos used in autostrada plazas. But those machines were serious equipment. Most home superautos I've tried have had a hard time producing good shots. But it can be done.

reply
joe_mamba 11 hours ago
>consider getting a minimalist lever machine

Before spending money on an espresso machine, make sure you have a good grinder first.

reply
boringg 11 hours ago
Before spending money on a good grinder, make sure you have access to reasonable good quality / priced beans in your area! Otherwise your OPEX really starts to go through the roof for shipping coffee (At least my area)
reply
joe_mamba 11 hours ago
>make sure you have access to reasonable good quality / priced beans in your area

Why? In which country can't you buy high-quality hipster single-origin beans online?

reply
stephen_g 35 minutes ago
Just upgraded to the Linea Mini after dreaming about it for almost 10 years - I actually used to have a two group ex-commercial machine in my kitchen that I got 15 years ago, so people are shocked when I tell them this machine was a big downsize from my old one!

Part of the reason I bought new is that they are so expensive on the second hand market here - so I’m not too worried that I’ll get most of my money back if I upgrade to something else in 10-15 years.

I’m going to overhaul the old commercial machine and will probably get a bit more than what I paid for it so not complaining!

reply
jasonjei 12 hours ago
I love my La Marzocco Linea Micra. It’s exceptionally well-built and feels like an Apple product in its simplicity. The only downside is the app you have to use to use the programmed automated backflush.

But the user experience is remarkably simple. Turn the knob left to start the flow of water, turn the other way to stop. Move the dial to steam/froth milk. Fantastic default water pressure and even better tasting coffee. It’s a machine that will last a decade if not longer.

reply
jjulius 3 hours ago
>The only downside is the app you have to use to use the programmed automated backflush.

Goddamnit, why the fuck can't we just have a machine that fucking does everything we need it to, on its own? An espresso machine requires a fucking app? Goddamnit.

Yes, I realize nothing about this comment is constructive.

reply
phil_kahrl 2 hours ago
Just bought a La Micra last year. Big factor was knowing I can get parts and service for life. I had a lesser known brand machine for almost 15 years, but at some point I couldn't get parts or anyone to work on it, so it died when the pump gasket failed.
reply
skrtskrt 11 hours ago
They must have machines that are not app-enabled right?

I sort of understand why their consumer machines would have that crap but I imagine that plenty of commercial places buying a $20k+ machine for a cafe that's supposed to run for 40 years would not accept having an app involved in maintenance.

reply
lostlogin 11 hours ago
It’s bad.

Go into a service shop and see what they think of the computerised La Marsocco. Great coffee, amazing looking machine. But servicing…

I got awfully close to getting one then went for an e61. I’m very sure the coffee isn’t as good. I’m very sure the machine will have parts for a long time - it’s been 60 years so far.

reply
jareds 11 hours ago
I wasn't planning on buying one, but I'll add this to the list of app enabled coffee tech I refuse to buy. As someone who's blind I'm getting really tired of app enabled coffee equipment with no open source integrations or protocol documentation. Fellow also doesn't appear to make any effort to make there apps accessible. They have had there Aiden out for over a year and I still don't see any notes about accessibility in there app update. I'm not going to buy one and use the home assistant integration since that could break at any time. Luckily I'm more of a coffee drinker instead of espresso so the Ratio Four works well enough for single cups and half pots.
reply
sonofhans 11 hours ago
A decade seems good to you? We’re still just talking about heat and pressure, well-understood problems. There’s no excuse for a machine like this not to outlive the original owner. Anything else is planned obsolescence or a manufacturing defect.
reply
Hikikomori 11 hours ago
Certainly like a apple in terms of price.
reply
caycep 11 hours ago
I feel like this is where narrative/marketing does something independent of actual results. I mean, I'm sure a good engineer can figure out the fluid dynamics/pressures/seals/filtration reasonably easily.
reply
dfxm12 2 hours ago
A lot of the appeal of the older models, besides the brand name, is the beautiful design. It's like a functional work of art. As a brand that stood the test of time, LM's are also easy to restore too.

Yeah, you can get a cheaper machine, but it's not going to look as cool (this is subjective of course).

reply
napierzaza 24 minutes ago
[dead]
reply
nicoritschel 12 hours ago
If you're ever in Florence, Italy and love coffee (and La Marzocco) do yourself a favor and visit the museum https://lamarzocco.com/mktcenter/visit-us-in-italy/
reply
inasio 11 hours ago
Vancouver also has a pretty nice La Marzocco showroom, the occasionally organize events, and can always go by to view the very nice machines and if you ask politely you'll get an amazing espresso
reply
porphyra 11 hours ago
Somehow, the Bay Area, which is full of really rich coffee drinkers, doesn't have a La Marzocco showroom or even any big coffee equipment shop (Seattle Coffee Gear in Stanford shopping mall in Palo Alto closed a couple years ago).
reply
RandallBrown 12 hours ago
If you're ever in Seattle you can visit the La Marzocco US headquarters and actually try out their machines.

I actually hate coffee, but I go by their building every day and the machines are very impressive looking.

reply
realo 11 hours ago
I used to have a decent espresso machine at home, and try , from time to time, supposedly "barista quality" espressos from cafes around here.

I agree wholeheartedly with those who say the coffee beans, the grinder and the barista are more important than the machine.

Nowadays at home I use a very simple Bialetti Brikka with exactly 200 ml of water and 20 g of coffee. God shots every single time.

reply
deaux 11 hours ago
Interesting, IME it's all beans. At my go-to place, the baristas are pretty bad but the two owners are super dedicated to roasting their own beans, you can always see them putting a lot of time and effort into it. Result is much better than places where the baristas are skilled but they use cheap pre-roasted bulk beans.

To take it to an extreme, I doubt the best barista in the world is going to get a good shot out of the default Starbucks beans. But maybe I'm wrong!

reply
httpsterio 11 hours ago
You're not wrong, bad beans are bad beans. But on the other hand, no matter how fancy single origin perfectly roasted beans you have, a crappy barista will most likely pull a terrible shot.

Beans can't compensate for the lack of skill.

reply
httpsterio 11 hours ago
That can't really be called a shot anymore tho, you're not even in a lungo territory if you're pulling a 200ml shot.

Or do you mean an Americano? Are you adding water afterwards?

reply
laserlight 6 minutes ago
> 200ml shot

It's not an espresso.

reply
realo 11 hours ago
Americano? I would not touch that with a ten-foot pole.

No... no water. The Brikka has a pressure valve and the 200 ml of water yield about 125-150 ml of coffee.

You might call it a double lungo, but with a bit of crema (yep) and no acidity or sour taste. Just sweet coffee with nice chocolate notes.

I use coffee beans from Papua New Guinea, roasted locally at the coffee shop.

reply
darkteflon 10 hours ago
I’ve used cafetière off-and-on in the past but felt that I could never get the pressure high enough and the amount short enough. You’re saying that the Brikka produces enough pressure for an espresso? Is this something specific to the Brikka or will any Bialetti stovetop do? Can I use half or 1/3 as much water as you? Cafetière seem to have a minimum lower bound but I like it short short.
reply
realo 10 hours ago
It is specific to the Brikka. They put a pressure valve in the column. The coffee must reach a certain pressure before it starts to flow.

You may try whatever amount of water you want... just don't let it burn in place!

There is a subtle balancing act between the quantity of coffee in the basket (how much headspace you keep) and the amount of water ( a ratio of 10:1 with the coffee -- before making the coffee -- yields good results for me).

So ... if you put less water, that means less coffee... which means more empty space in the basket, which modifies the dynamics.

Pro tip: use as little heat as possible to get the water to a gentle boil. Otherwise you might burn the coffee in the basket. Bad.

In short, you will have to experiment...

reply
darkteflon 10 hours ago
Okay very interesting. Thanks for the detailed answer. I looked into it a bit more[1], it sounds like the valve is producing 1.5 bar. A very nice stovetop for a moka, but probably not a good fit for me.

[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/Coffee/comments/15zabe/does_the_bia...

reply
boulos 11 hours ago
How do you like the brikka vs the classic?
reply
realo 10 hours ago
Two different machines, they make very different coffee.

The brikka is exceptional, if you like espresso.

I have a Brikka "Induction" with a stainless steel machined bottom part. Today I looked and apparently they decided to skimp and only offer the aluminum (non induction compatible) version. Pity.

reply
cjr 11 hours ago
Isn’t Kees van der Westen the ferrari of coffee machines?!
reply
porphyra 11 hours ago
That's more like the Spyker of coffee machines. Incidentally I went to a random coffee shop that had a Speedster in it. It was great.
reply
reaperducer 11 hours ago
Isn’t Kees van der Westen the ferrari of coffee machines?!

From TFA:

It’s why Sean Henry, the owner of Houndstooth Coffee in Dallas and Austin, Texas, was willing to drive across the state in 2009 to pick up a limited-edition La Marzocco machine that the company made in partnership with the Dutch designer Kees van der Westen.

reply
FuriouslyAdrift 11 hours ago
So... what is the Corolla of espresso machines?
reply
arndt 2 hours ago
Gaggia Classic Pro, modded with Gagguino or Gaggimate. Only downside - single boiler.
reply
01100011 11 hours ago
My Breville Bambino Plus was cheap and produces a pretty reliable shot.
reply
el_benhameen 2 hours ago
I don’t have the plus, but the non plus still produces better espresso than I can get from the spots near me. As the proud owner of a 2008 Corolla, I approve.
reply
lostlogin 11 hours ago
reply
zulux 8 hours ago
Good machine, and you can upgrade it with a PID.

And you will have enough money left over to get a great grinder.

reply
FuriouslyAdrift 11 hours ago
I am being told by my local coffee geeks that it's Gaggia
reply
lostlogin 10 hours ago
I moved on from the Sylvia a long time ago. I just love its story (made from the parts bin as a gift for suppliers). The size is attractive and it’s a little monster in n terms of bang-for-buck. I made ~15k coffees on it and it had one cheap service before it was elevated to ‘The Shelf’ with an Atomic espresso maker.
reply
neogodless 11 hours ago
I've bought Corollas for less than that ...
reply
lostlogin 10 hours ago
I’ve sold Carollas for less.

But, the milage you’ll get on a Sylvia is higher.

reply
dismalaf 2 hours ago
I've got a DeLonghi Dedica Duo which makes much better coffee than it has any right to... And it's very cheap.

Even can adjust temperature and shot water volume...

reply
fxtentacle 11 hours ago
The Dedelonri I bought in Vietnam for $20. It’s a Chinese fake of a budget machine. But it has insanely high pressure and produces way better coffee than anyone finds reasonable.

But secretly, I think it’s all just the super fresh high quality beans that you can buy in Vietnam. They cultivate a regional variant of arabica in their highlands. And even using a standard Bialetti Moca cup produces exceptional results with that coffee.

reply
klausa 11 hours ago
Gaggia.
reply
porphyra 11 hours ago
Breville Barista Express probably.
reply
stonogo 11 hours ago
I've definitely seen these in more homes and offices than anything from La Marzocco.
reply
porphyra 10 hours ago
The fact that it costs a tenth of the La Marzocco Linea Mini helps a lot.
reply
elAhmo 10 hours ago
Delonghi Dedica!
reply
doctorpangloss 11 hours ago
putting milk in your coffee haha
reply
testfrequency 12 hours ago
If only hip cafes that get custom built ones knew how to pull an actual espresso shot.

New rule should be La Marzocco judges every barista on their skills before being able to flip a paddle, which requires a bespoke NFC card linked to their certification.

Yes I’m salty about the amount of aesthetic cafes that have no idea what to do about their coffee program because all they care about is being a hip third space.

reply
skhameneh 11 hours ago
One coffee shop near me (since closed) had a Group 3 Slayer paired with a Super Jolly (but they also didn't know how to pull a decent shot).

For those unfamiliar, Slayer is (imo the best) one of the top $$$ machines and pairing it with a budget grinder is a classic sign the owner doesn't know a thing about coffee. Often the grinder is more influential than the espresso machine.

And how I mention "Group 3" that means it has three brewing heads. They were using a ~$20-30k espresso machine paired with a run of the mill budget grinder.

reply
wiradikusuma 11 hours ago
Boy different world different meaning of "expensive." I'm opening a cafe in Jakarta and I'm thinking if I should get a used Super Jolly or something _cheaper_.
reply
stephen_g 40 minutes ago
The Super Jolly is fine, I have a used one at home that I’ve had for 15 years (which I use now with a Linea Mini that I just a couple of months ago) and get really good results.

The point is that investing in such a crazy expensive machine but not a much better grinder is really foolish, because the machine is going to be limited by the grinder so they may as well buy a machine that is 1/3 the price.

But really it sounds like 80% of the problem in the case tow OP is talking about still would have been the poor skills of the baristas, because they should still be able to pull very decent shots even with the mid-range grinder.

reply
mashygpig 11 hours ago
In my anecdotal experience of reacting to “wow this espresso is good” it’s often been a Slayer machine. It’s been a rough indicator of where to get good coffee for me.
reply
jfindley 11 hours ago
I tend to look at the grinder and also the choice of the beans (roast level, consistency, chips). As another commenter pointed out you do occasionally get places that will buy a super fancy machine but have no idea what to do with it. It's rarer to spend loads on a fancy grinder if you don't know what you're doing.
reply
mashygpig 10 hours ago
100%, I just don’t have an eye yet for commercial grinders :)
reply
porphyra 11 hours ago
La Marzocco has such brand recognition that a lot of newbie coffee shops would buy one, but people who buy a more niche commercial machine like a Slayer or a Synesso probably know what they are doing. Still, there's nothing wrong with the machine itself and there are plenty of really great coffee shops with a La Marzocco.
reply
mashygpig 10 hours ago
Totally, I meant no shade to LaMarzocco. They’re some of my favorite looking machines too :)
reply
lostlogin 11 hours ago
> New rule should be La Marzocco judges every barista on their skills before being able to flip a paddle, which requires a bespoke NFC card linked to their certification.

The same La Marzocco that puts fake paddles on their cheaper machines when whats there is really just a button?

reply
voxadam 12 hours ago
Unless your plan is to eliminate La Marzocco machines from the secondary market by rapidly buying up the old machines, at a substantial premium, and leasing all future machines I'm pretty sure you'd run into difficulty implementing any sort of mandatory certification requirement.
reply
richwater 12 hours ago
As unfeasible as the original post is, I do empathize. There is a trend of expensive coffee places spending all this money on everything but training the actual employees.
reply
ahoka 12 hours ago
All that effort to serve lemon juice. Sigh...
reply
dfxm12 3 hours ago
Italian design from some of these eras is unmatched. A new LMLM is beautiful, but even the budget home espresso machines from Gaggia used to take it more seriously. A Gaggia classic pro [0] that you can buy today looks clean but boring, but previous era Gaggia Baby [1] would look amazing on any countertop or even as an objet d'art. The lines of the Gaggia Espresso [2] are reminiscent of a Ferrari Testarossa.

0 - https://coffeegeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Gaggia-Cla...

1 - https://live.staticflickr.com/5749/20930782499_f47f18391a_b....

2 - https://preview.redd.it/i-call-your-oldies-and-raise-this-19...

reply
wslh 11 hours ago
Since the thread is full of coffee enthusiasts: I recently stepped outside my espresso-only routine and started appreciating V60 and Origami pour-overs. It's been great realizing how much depth there is outside of espresso. Where does the rest of HN crowd land on pour-overs?
reply
el_benhameen 2 hours ago
My espresso routine is a strong Americano made with two doubles and a little bit of water (I think I may get some hate for the Americano?). I like it, but it does take a little while to measure, grind, pull, clean, etc. If I don’t feel like going through the whole routine, then a strong V60 pour over is a great substitute. 25-30 grams of the same beans, fairly finely ground, at a 1:13-1:15 ratio works well. Not quite as rich or as pleasant a mouthfeel as the Americano, but good.
reply
Finnucane 2 hours ago
I use a Melitta pour over cone, a Baratza grinder, a kettle with a temp control, and a spoon. Once in a while, I'll get out the French press. Good coffee doesn't really need to be complicated. You just need decent fresh beans and a little care.
reply
dfxm12 2 hours ago
I like the idea of a no bypass brewer, like the ceado hoop. It's somewhat more efficient with coffee and more consistent, plus it doesn't benefit from any specific type of kettle or any type of technique. You just pour the water and wait. The shape prevents it from fitting on every mug/carafe, and that's annoying.

I've been eying a hario switch to try something new. The chemex gets marks from me for design & size when I need to make a big pot for guests.

reply
gyanchawdhary 11 hours ago
La Marzocco GS3 and Olympia Express owner here. LM isn't the Ferrari ... that title really should go to KVW and Slayer :)
reply
cjr 9 hours ago
Nice! Which one do you use most often?
reply
gyanchawdhary 4 hours ago
GS3 3 times a day :) it’s got a timer to auto start every morning and the iPhone app is super convenient to switch on and pre heat the machine ..the Olympia is the Leica of espresso machines, beautiful but limited .. it’s really designed for Italian style espresso (dark roast) and even the Olympia grinder works best for dark roasts
reply