Then they’ll deploy models trained on this, and begin capturing employees using AIs that are good at using AIs to do work.
Repeat a few times and they’ll start capturing the keystrokes from people mashing their heads into keyboards with dispair and exclaiming, “Why can’t these models do anything anymore!!”
It’s only once the business is having a cash crunch or will no longer need to hire competitive candidates that they start letting people go without severance.
These models already have the skills that humans were using them for, so either by training the models to use subagents or simply inlining the work done by the AI, you have a much easier time training the model to perform tasks from a human-distribution. The humans have done the work of making the human-distribution look more like an AI distribution.
If it is as you say, then eventually the house of cards will crumble. Then we can finally go back to work and quit being inundated with needing to use AI for everything.
And you expect Meta employees, of all people, to believe this?
Someone had to do it, distasteful though it may be. Could be quite hilarious what it learns in the process.
Sure, you can do everything a human can, but it also seems VERY inefficient
As an alternative, maybe you could just do network in/out?
Also people use their work accounts and laptops to read their w2 and other sensitive info.
You can browser personal accounts from your phone.
I’m surprised this needs to be said out loud.
Yes they could have accessed logs before but there’s a difference between directed checking after incidents and active surveillance at scale.
It had no impact of recruiters trying to win me back since then.