HardenedBSD Is Now Officially on Radicle
62 points by lftherios 4 hours ago | 8 comments
ramon156 2 hours ago
In this scenario, how does p2p compare to ATProto? The downside of both is that you still need high available servers
replyfc417fc802 60 minutes ago
I don't think so? In the case of p2p (including radicle) you can run multiple not-so-reliable nodes. Of course that won't work for serving up a web frontend but that's distinct from the git repo itself.
reply
The article mentions an us and a you, but I feel like it would have been an useful occasion to explain why move (from where?) and why Radicle. Maybe this was already discussed elsewhere?
I suppose similar discussions regarding GitHub are happening today and could explain why this was posted to HN.
> Radicle’s Collaborative Objects (COBs) provide Radicle’s social primitive. This enables features such as issues, discussions and code review to be implemented as Git objects. Developers can extend Radicle’s capabilities to build any kind of collaboration flow they see fit.
I'm not sure that this will actually solve the problem. This seems more like a facade for a move they wanted to do anyways.