Why did you choose to have Claude write it in assembly language?There are big benefits to using a language that has good static analysis with LLMs.

we are there now. depending on boot loader&#x2F;os combination, one can get to the sub 1-5 sec range, if its cli-only.

I’m inspired by the message.On this software itself: I’d like to know how this feels to use. It’s so very lightweight. Does it feel categorically different to what we are used to?One of the things I miss about the 1980s home computers is that they booted into a usable command line in a handful of seconds, from a few KB in ROM. Imagine what today’s HW could do if we’d retained that level of efficiency.

Some screenies and the code at 0…I struggle to understand why, though.0: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;isene&#x2F;chasm" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;isene&#x2F;chasm</a>

Did OP write this by hand? It reads like language written by a human overfitted on GPT 4o or Claude.