The main thing about P2P meth is that there's so much of it (2022)
45 points by tomjakubowski 3 hours ago | 22 comments

keepamovin 47 minutes ago
The ephedrine (or pseudoephedrine) synthesis is a one step using phosphorus/iodine reduction directly to methamphetamine. It’s simple and clean in that only an acid base extraction is required, and only one set of NP solvents.

All these others syntheses with multiple steps up the chances of weird toxic solvents or contaminants creeping in. I think it’s a contaminant issue that’s exacerbated by the drug use.

The government should just regulate it, control purity and production and let people access small amounts for recreation/performance. It’s not an evil drug per se - long history before it was criminalized. Plus that would neuter the cartels and protect people’s health more than pushing it underground.

reply
therobots927 24 minutes ago
Check out the book “The Fort Bragg Cartel” if you’re wondering why drugs are illegal even if legalization makes more sense from a harm reduction standpoint. The highest levels of the military are involved in drug trafficking. Use of drugs by clandestine colonial states goes all the way back to the opium wars. US is nothing new. The deep state funds off the books operations with drug money and possibly human trafficking as well.
reply
fwipsy 16 minutes ago
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. "Go read this book" ain't it.
reply
serf 4 minutes ago
reply
jrflowers 5 minutes ago
“I don’t feel like reading a book” isn’t a counter argument. That’s just a tidbit about how your day is going
reply
f33d5173 2 hours ago
Tried clicking the fivethirtyeight link halfway down the article, and was immediately reminded of what abc decided to start doing today. What an asshole move.
reply
umanwizard 28 minutes ago
What are you referring to?
reply
asdff 20 minutes ago
ABC deleted all the old 538 archives and refused to entertain selling the IP back to Nate Silver and prefer to let it die.
reply
serf 6 minutes ago
>..What evidence is there that these have a chemical difference?

3 lines later..

>.. The Drug Enforcement Agency tests the meth they seize to see how it was made.

quick answer!

reply
RajT88 2 hours ago
The insane thing for me is seeing how tightly meth purity correlated with the airing of Breaking Bad.
reply
milesvp 12 minutes ago
I was thinking the same thing, though I couldn't remember the timeline. Makes me wonder if there was something already in the zeitgeist, or if it was fueled by the obsession with purity in the series. I could totally see Breaking Bad causing chemists to want to up their game, or causing chemists to get clowned for having low purity.
reply
cjbgkagh 4 minutes ago
Prior to breaking bad there were stats linking addictiveness to purity, police crackdowns reduced purity which reduced addictiveness. As the market expanded and matured the effect of the crackdowns on purity was diminished. At least that is how I remember it.
reply
trhway 2 minutes ago
yes, while the show probably popularized the idea of pure meth, in general strict prohibition leads to increase in purity and potency. We've recently seen that with heroin/fentanyl. There is probably still no "fentanyl of meth", and thus so far only purity increase. Once a more potent, fentanyl-like, meth appears, it will probably similarly get into and displace a lot of classic meth trade.
reply
trhway 2 hours ago
>He points out that “old” meth was made from ephedrine and that “new” meth is made from a chemical called Phenylacetone or P2P

the new is just the old that came back. The old meth, "biker meth", was P2P. Then was ephedrine, and with a crackdown on ephedrine - back to P2P.

Another noticeable thing - the recent shortage of ADHD medication while supposedly illegal meth production has been growing. Demand is present in both cases while capitalism model of responding with supply works very well only in one.

reply
arcfour 23 minutes ago
In the former case, you have government artificially suppressing supply and acting to dissuade pharmacies from keeping almost any extra stock, which is unfortunate.
reply
SV_BubbleTime 2 hours ago
Fantastic write up.

I think the biggest takeaway for me is just how insanely ineffective banning pseudoephedrine over the counter was.

Price went down, usage went up overdose went up, seizures went up, the production just changed quickly and there wasn’t even a blip.

Billions of uses of bullshit decongestant products that didn’t work at all… and to get the good stuff you still need to buy it from behind the counter and give ID.

reply
LocalH 45 minutes ago
Human society has a massive issue with blindness towards n-order effects (they barely consider second-order effects, never mind thinking further out)
reply
meowkit 30 minutes ago
I don't think its innate though - most people I've met can think of higher order consequences or at least understand them.

The real issue is actually measuring results. I think we have to design society to factor higher order effects in. That means a fundamentally new approach to things like voting and tracking accountability.

Is it even possible? Who knows. Sometimes I think our problems have outstripped individual life spans which makes them intractable.

reply
boldlybold 2 hours ago
That's all correct, and nobody seems to care. Nobody is ever going to improve the system, and us law abiding citizens are left with the consequences.
reply
nerdsniper 54 minutes ago
The other day I needed pseudoephedrine, so I asked for one box of instant tablets and one box of extended release capsules. The store said they’re only allowed to sell me one box so I had to choose.

I’m so glad these policies made it so meth isn’t super easy to find anymore.

Oh wait, meth is still dirt cheap fucking everywhere, but now I also can’t get effective cold medicine either. Can we please just admit this policy doesn’t have any effect on the meth supply curve and please put pseudoephedrine back in Dayquil?

reply
s5300 58 minutes ago
[dead]
reply
newsclues 2 hours ago
Thanks China.
reply