Click (2016)
194 points by andrewzeno 3 hours ago | 41 comments

foxfired 2 hours ago
I've always added analytics scripts on websites I worked on. It was second nature for me. Then when I got my own start up, I didn't just add regular analytics but one that tracks mouse movements so you can watch sessions back like a video [0].

I told a friend about my start up and she jumped on it immediately. I opened the tool and watched her interaction. Then I told her "oh so you opened the dev tools" She immediately ended the session. "How did you know? That's creepy". It was the first time I've actually felt like these tools invade privacy.

Yeah, we include it in our terms and condition and privacy page, but I don't think users truly grasp how those tools work. I understand that all analytics tools provide this feature now, but its always creepy to know someone can watch what you are doing.

[0]: https://idiallo.com/blog/spying-on-your-user

reply
jrowen 2 hours ago
I think there's a very interesting duality forming around privacy. It seems like most people don't really care if they're being filmed, or if their data is being slurped up six ways from Sunday, as long as it's aggregated and going through automated systems. But as soon as it feels like an actual person is looking at individual behavior, it's creepy (which is, of course, always a possibility, but plausible deniability is a powerful thing).
reply
m463 2 hours ago
it's not a duality at all. the people don't know.

the people doing the "analytics" (surveillance) like their privacy too, because they are doing creepy stuff and don't want people to know it. And even if they aren't doing creepy stuff, the data might be used that way in the future (profile building, psychological tricks, personalized pricing, sharing behavior with others, etc)

reply
singpolyma3 46 minutes ago
Yes. This is it. People are used to "private conversation in public restaurant". It's not private because no one can hear, but because no one is listening.
reply
vitally3643 40 minutes ago
Right, the very nature of human society for the last several thousand years has been privacy in public. You walk around outside where everyone can see you, but the societal expectation is that you don't watch others. You have conversations in public because that's where life happens, but they're still private conversations.

Every counter-example to this is people being intentionally creepy, inappropriate, or outright malicious. Which was a manageable problem when it was just a single dude being weird, society would eventually exclude and shun them. Trouble is today that we've mechanised malicious inappropriate behavior at scale and ensured we've set up our entire society and government such that the people responsible can never be held accountable in any way. So long as you're being maliciously creepy at scale (and you're wealthy) everything's fine and there's no consequences.

reply
latexr 2 hours ago
> It seems like most people don't really care if they're being filmed, or if their data is being slurped up six ways from Sunday

For the majority of people I don’t think it’s true that they don’t care, but rather that they don’t know, don’t understand the implications, or don’t have the luxury of being able to do anything about it.

In the instances where I was able to have a longer discussion with someone to really explain what’s going on, they did care. Even if they previously said they didn’t.

reply
ryukoposting 42 minutes ago
Or, they do know and they do care, but they're so exhausted by the hostile patterns of our industry that they've given up.
reply
Sophira 60 minutes ago
> Yeah, we include it in our terms and condition and privacy page

Please be honest with yourself. People don't read terms and conditions. There's a good chance you don't read terms and conditions. And even if you do, odds are better than even that you don't fully understand all the legal implications.

Terms and conditions pages nowadays are there mostly to provide legal protection under the guise of "the user told us that they read these by ticking a box on our signup page; it's hardly our fault if they didn't."

reply
dheera 26 minutes ago
I'm also of the opinion that at lot of T&C are basically signing under duress and I consider them invalid. Like if I have to sign a T&C with Google Play and a T&C with your city's sanctioned parking app in order to park on the street, I consider both of those T&C's invalid. As a legal resident of the country with a legally owned car and legal driving license, I should be able to park and pay, I shouldn't have to agree to anything else.
reply
komali2 13 minutes ago
Your city doesn't have a way to pay for parking with cash on public roads? It's not a private lot? That should simply be illegal.
reply
htx80nerd 2 hours ago
Everyone knows stores have security cameras. But if you called them up and said 'I saw you pick up the chips' they wouldnt have a good feeling.

Everyone understands websites use analytics and tracking, but people dont want to be reminded of it. Which is why people hate those FB ads which exactly match what you searched for 24 hours ago.

reply
EGreg 59 minutes ago
It's simple. It's because they imagine that "the computer system" is going to just be doing the "standard thing" it was programmed to do.

And until AI got better, that was a very reasonable assumption.

That's why I built https://safebots.ai -- because I want predictability again with AI. Provable predictability, in the same sense that smart contracts or appliances have.

reply
dang 43 minutes ago
Related. Others?

Click (2016) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35841679 - May 2023 (35 comments)

Click - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26518290 - March 2021 (243 comments)

Click click click - A browser-based game on online profiling. - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18636038 - Dec 2018 (1 comment)

A demonstration of browser events used to monitor online behaviour - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12985644 - Nov 2016 (165 comments)

reply
BudaDude 2 hours ago
Nice! It shouted "Bot" when I ran this in the console

for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { document.querySelector(".button")?.click(); }

reply
jagged-chisel 41 minutes ago
Used this and it replied (in the console): "Such a smart subject."

ETA: It also took a few seconds to get around to telling me (from the bottom up):

    Subject has clicked on the button a thousand times.
    Subject has clicked on the button one hundred times.
    Subject clicks less than most other subjects.
    Subject has run script to click on the button ten times within one second.
    Subject has clicked on the button nine times within one second.
    Subject has clicked on the button eight times within one second.
I wonder if it can distinguish between human clicks and scripted clicks if it's saying "...clicks less than most..." or if everyone is scripting a million clicks.
reply
Barbing 53 minutes ago
Awesome. Looking for this as an iOS app, since I learned dismissing notifications phones home. (Useful feature for multidevice cloud services but can be creepy, companies learning the notifications we expand or leftswipe away… learning our sleep schedules and preferences and all that in ways we might not have specifically expected in this exact case)

Apps know when we’re on WiFi, when we force quit, have potential to have motion sensor access if opting in…

Not sure the presentation needed for acceptance into the App Store. As a security checkup tool or something…

reply
CSMastermind 2 hours ago
This brings me back to the glory days of StumbleUpon. Highly recommend.
reply
maxverse 3 hours ago
I enjoyed playing with this. Wild how much it knows.
reply
herpdyderp 2 hours ago
Looks like it got HN’d to death
reply
mrkn1 2 hours ago
I made something very similar 2 weeks ago, re the upcoming OpenAI phone.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040327

reply
hspeiser 3 hours ago
thats pretty creepy. I find it unnerving that they know exactly where my cursor is.
reply
LeoPanthera 2 hours ago
You might like Pointer Pointer. It's pretty funny. https://pointerpointer.com

(It might not work on touch screens.)

reply
rolph 3 hours ago
would be creepiest if your cursor moved somewhere related to what you were saying outloud.

the capability is there, your local hardware determines how seamless it would be.

reply
_carbyau_ 56 minutes ago
And yet, so many people think Cursor-camp[0] is great.

Mental framing of a tech is weird.

[0]https://neal.fun/cursor-camp/

reply
ProAm 2 hours ago
So does every advertiser and data broker in the world
reply
slopinthebag 2 hours ago
[flagged]
reply
raincole 2 hours ago
HN comments really can't beat the spectrum stereotypes...

But seriously, the parent comment isn't saying the technical fact a browser can see your cursor's coordinate is unnerving. They're saying the experience of being reminded of this fact is unnerving.

Technically, every time you take a bus ride the driver can just decide to crash the vehicle and kill the passengers and himself. This fact itself isn't unnerving -- it's just how buses work. But if there were a poster on the bus reminding passengers of that, that'd be quite unnerving.

reply
sneak 2 hours ago
This demonstrates a surprising lack of empathy.

It’s unnerving because people don’t like being watched.

reply
slopinthebag 2 hours ago
People aren't being watched...
reply
Sophira 46 minutes ago
I'm guessing this is supposed to illustrate how tracking is ubiquitous, given what I see in the source code.

In my case, though, after carefully enabling only scripts from the site and the Cloudflare CDN, but not enabling XHR/websockets back to the source page, or any cookies, the only thing that happens for me is:

1. I see a button and an exhortation to click the button.

2. I click the button.

3. The site goes "Subject has clicked the button."

4. The site goes "...".

...and then nothing else happens, no matter where I click or move my mouse. In the background I can see attempted websocket connections, but I'm blocking those so they can't happen.

If the aim of the game is to open people's eyes to the dangers of online tracking, it feels like there should be a reward mechanism if such tracking is blocked!

reply
jagged-chisel 39 minutes ago
I unlocked at least one "achievement" by blocking camera access.
reply
10000truths 3 hours ago
I'm getting a PR_END_OF_FILE_ERROR when I try to open the page in Firefox on Linux.
reply
briandw 2 hours ago
Very fun, I enjoyed seeing what it would react to.
reply
preinheimer 3 hours ago
Heads up: there's audio. It does add something.
reply
grumpymuppet 2 hours ago
As a semi-savvy programmer, but with little experience in web-dev, I'm actually a bit ignorant of what a site can measure -- client side -- versus collect server side.

Presumably it's a simple matter to send something back to a server, but I've really never thought about the mechanisms involved.

reply
jamiek88 3 hours ago
Hmmm. Clever and a little spooky!
reply
xiaoluolyg 25 minutes ago
clever
reply
ProAm 2 hours ago
This is a great POC about how you give up privacy just using the web. This data is bought and sold and more and used against you every day
reply
busymom0 3 hours ago
I am not sure what I am looking at. It's telling me things which I expect any website to know via basic javascript. What am I missing?
reply
layer8 2 hours ago
That you’re not the target audience.
reply
claysmithr 3 hours ago
kind of weirded me out lol...
reply
d4rkp4ttern 2 hours ago
reply