I found a seashell in the middle of the desert
118 points by Hawzen 2 days ago | 29 comments
hendry 47 minutes ago
I found a sea shell in a visit to Latamber in Pakistan (NWFP): https://www.flickr.com/photos/hendry/73369720/
replyGemini says "As the crow flies (Straight-line distance): Approximately 900 to 920 kilometers (roughly 560 to 570 miles) directly north of the coast at Karachi"
tokai 22 minutes ago
Maybe some geology buffs can correct me, but as I understand it there has been three periods with ocean on top of the crust we call Pakistan today. The Proto-Tethys, Paleo-Tethys, and Tethys Ocean. Many hundreds of millions of years of being ocean.
replycolechristensen 10 minutes ago
Because of the Indian subcontinent colliding with the Eurasian plate there's a wide variety of origins for the surface geology in that region.
replyAn incredibly detailed and descriptive map:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/52/1964_Pak...
analogpixel 50 minutes ago
I guess He didn't see the Reddit post in R/SaudiArabianDesertLostandFound
reply> "if anyone finds my lucky seashell that I lost, could you please return it. I think I lost it near the Alghat desert while I was sledding down a sand dune.
Cockbrand 2 hours ago
She sells seashells in the Sahara was my first association, but then the article clearly states that we're talking about a different desert.
replythrow310822 13 minutes ago
Looks like ampullospira, documented in Saudi Arabia. Age (middle-upper Jurassic) and actual location also match.
replymarkdown 60 minutes ago
What a ridiculous place to put a blog. Why is this on github?
replycharcircuit 2 hours ago
I don't understand why the author didn't put all of these pictures and information of where he found it into an AI like ChatGPT. That should be the first thing one should try.
replytomstuart 58 minutes ago
Among a strong field, this is the single most depressing comment I’ve ever read on Hacker News. Several grim components but it’s the “I don’t understand why” which seals the deal.
replyAzantys 2 hours ago
I trust a proper solution (even though I can be certain how accurate it is), which compares to a known dataset much more than just giving it an AI. For identifying current living species it is probably fine but this is something to nice for an AI to be trustable. Also this path is much more fun and you learn sonething along the way!
replyry-grah 2 hours ago
but, from my understanding what the author was really wanting was an adventure and to learn new things. he gained so much more than just learning what type of shell it is
replysam_goody 58 minutes ago
The AI would confidently give him the wrong answer, since it has no way to provide the correct answer, and doesn't know its own limitations. (Or however you wish to describe "hallucinations", which is about as accurate as my description ;))
replyAnd he would think he has the right answer, perhaps write up an essay about his findings, which later AI bots will read and learn from, propgating the mistake...
CamperBob2 35 minutes ago
The AI would confidently give him the wrong answer
replyThere is irony here that does not sleep.
sublinear 18 minutes ago
Is this example of vector search not "AI" enough?
replyaddandsubtract 14 minutes ago
GenAI is the new AI, now, unfortunately. PapersWithCode died for this.
reply
I’m more interested in the giant face carved into the rocks in the second photo. Does this person not realise they’ve discovered a previously unknown sculpture of Yahoo-Wahoo?
And given the whole premise of the piece is “this should not be here!” I don’t really understand the point you’re making. The author says it’s a strange find in that area - so either they have a valid point or they don’t.
I don’t know if it’s a fossil. It doesn’t look like a fossil to me. I’m not a fossil expert. The only way to tell if it is a fossil is to do some analysis on the actual specimen before writing screeds about what it might or might not be based on visual similarity.