As a software engineer I have some intuition for what the risks are of letting agents do some tasks vs others.<p>I don&#x27;t have a similar intuition calibrated for what could go wrong when asking AI to draft a legal document. Some things seem harmless, i.e. drafting a will, but I don&#x27;t really know- our legal system is notoriously rife with footguns.

If you want human connection the legal system is not where you are going to find it, period.<p>I don&#x27;t think there will be any such market for &quot;non ai&quot; law.  If I&#x27;m involved with the legal system I just want out as quick as possible as cheap as possible.

I think there will be a market for firms that aggressively market themselves as non-AI, and then as more people turn towards that human connection we&#x27;ll go full circle

&gt; In a blind evaluation of nearly 3,000 anonymized comparisons, professors rated AI responses significantly higher than answers written by other professors, with AI winning 75% of head-to-head matchups.<p>75% win rate seems pretty good!

Stanford is very good at flagging critical comments. It is a school for obedient and dumb industry servants, so they monitor the comment sections.