Hacking your PC using your speaker without ever touching it
63 points by xx_ns 49 minutes ago | 13 comments

hootz 23 minutes ago
>Email from SingCERT stating vendor "do not consider this to be a vulnerability, as it does not present a cybersecurity risk."

So wirelessly writing custom firmware to someone else's device that is connected via USB to their computer without even needing to pair is not a security vulnerability. Yea.

reply
Uncle_Brumpus 17 minutes ago
"You can just make it type words, what's the risk in that?"

Makes you wonder what other peripheral companies out there are also operating with seemingly no security team. There must be other vulnerabilities like this just waiting to be discovered.

My brother was awoken one morning at 2am because some neighborhood kids connected to his bluetooth speaker and blasted fart sounds on loop at max volume, and that's literally only the absolute tippy top of the malicious bluetooth use iceberg.

reply
hootz 11 minutes ago
Oh yeah, for some reason the companies with the highest risk products seem to be the ones that care less about security. Don't even get me started with "smart" bulbs and cameras that each individually connect to your local network and the Internet. You have 5 lightbulbs? That's 5 different devices you need to track, keep updated and trust the in the vendor firmware's security.
reply
rcxdude 6 minutes ago
Probably most of them. It's not exactly an area with a great focus on quality, let alone security.
reply
xnickb 3 minutes ago
Yeah, but we already sold the device, so it's someone else's problem. Now if they were paying us a subscription fee..
reply
KurSix 9 minutes ago
The vendor response is the more worrying part
reply
3form 18 minutes ago
AND being able to further reprogram the device to gain control of the PC.

This is negligence of the highest kind.

reply
brogapp 3 minutes ago
Thanks for sharing this. It’s a bit concerning that a consumer soundbar can receive unauthenticated firmware over BLE and then act like a BadUSB-style HID on the host. I’m not sure I agree with the vendor’s "no cybersecurity risk" assessment, considering how much access a trusted keyboard interface typically has.
reply
217 38 minutes ago
Can't wait to see a video from a half sloppy channel about this on my youtube front page in roughly 4 business days
reply
tarcon 6 minutes ago
I guess you can still be first to Linkedin and get all of the fame.
reply
KurSix 11 minutes ago
The fact that the author had to publish a third-party patch because the vendor didn't consider it a vulnerability is not a great look
reply
awedisee 6 minutes ago
Way cool. Thank you for sharing
reply
bradley13 28 minutes ago
Good work, and fun to read.

It's crazy that companies just stick their head in the sand, when confronted with serious security issues.

reply