But then I thought, "I wonder how it would work on a normal computer like mine," and above all, "I wonder if it would work without going into OOM on a computer like mine." So I started working with the help of agents to test this possibility.
I started converting the model to int4, understanding MTP usage, and if possible implementing DSA for long context. How it responds in int4 and whether the quality is maintained or not. Until I got to the point, on my computer with 32GB of RAM, I was able to communicate with GLM 5.2 with times that, of course, aren't high in cold start, but even then, we're talking about 0.1 tok/s, but that wasn't important to me. The important thing was the journey to reach this goal. I just wanted it to work at all costs, even slowly.
So I created Colibrì, which was born from a very simple idea, to be honest, but tested in every way, where a 744B Mixture-of-Experts model activates only ~40B parameters per token—and only ~11 GB of those change from token to token (the routed experts). So:
The dense part (attention, shared experts, embeddings—~17B params) stays resident in RAM at int4 (~9.9 GB); The 21,504 routed experts (75 MoE layers × 256 experts + the MTP head, ~19 MB each at int4) live on disk (~370 GB) and are streamed on demand, with a per-layer LRU cache, an optional pinned hot-store, and the OS page cache as a free L2.
The engine is a single C file (c/glm.c, ~1,300 lines) plus small headers. No BLAS, no Python at runtime, no GPU.No GPU or serious hardware because I don't have that hardware so I can't test it on hardware that is more powerful than my computer.Colibrì is a one-person project, written and tested entirely on a 12-core laptop with 25 GB of RAM — the numbers above are the ceiling of what I can measure at home.
Any feedback is welcome! (and if anyone wanted to participate in the project I would be delighted)
0.05 to 0.1 tok/s on the other hand, as reported in the URL for the lowest class of hardware, isn't really usable for much.
edit: I think this is a fantastic project in general concept, and look forward to seeing more efforts towards the general idea of being able to run a 350B to 900B size model locally, even if as slow as 1 tok/s, on hardware that ordinary people can afford. Anything along the general concept of "we have fast read NVME SSD storage, we have a big ass model on local disk, we'll read it at 11GB/tok as we need it, not try to load the whole thing".
In theory MPI could distribute experts across nodes. In practice, for small clusters the added network latency usually hurts more than it helps.
Better suited for big clusters with fast interconnects. For now we're focusing on single-machine speed (caching, GPU hybrid, etc.).
Nice work!
If you want a CPU-only machine with 512GB to 1024GB of RAM, despite extreme cost rises, there are still some great options out there from companies selling ex-lease stuff that's 3, 4, 5 years old. It'll be loud as hell under full CPU load when running inference, so if you plan to use it at home, put it in your garage or basement or laundry room or somewhere similar on the far end of a network cable.
The software that OP has published appears to be specifically designed to hold only the active parameters in RAM (<100GB) and read content off local NVME SSD as needed on the fly. All that NVME SSD read wouldn't be necessary if you can hold the model in RAM, even in the absence of any GPUs.
Basically I kept needing an inference engine that could stream weights in and out as needed in an LRU manner. So I ended up vibe coding this thing that accepts a `--vram-budget` and stays under it (mostly). It turns out moving mmap'd bytes in and out of VRAM is way cheap compared to compute. Coupled with some pipelining/double-buffering, I almost always end up compute bound not memory bound. Granted I use way smaller models heh.