Show HN: textlog – A quiet, text-only microblogging platform, open-source, no JS
154 points by stagas 19 hours ago | 65 comments

byson94 23 minutes ago
That's really nice! I really like the UI of the site, its calm and soothing.
reply
anupamk 6 hours ago
This is really neat!

The main thing that stood out to me was, unlike many other micro/minimalist blogging platforms, textlog has individual notes (as opposed to blogs) as the primary unit. I feel that this choice often makes it psychologically easier for users to post something quickly without getting stuck on managing their blog’s brand and identity. Nothing wrong with the latter, but it comes with a trade-off.

And I really like the visual design: very clean and minimalistic, but also pleasant.

reply
toplinesoftsys 14 hours ago
I like this project. Simple, open-source, nice UI.
reply
Natalia724 12 hours ago
Agreed. A documented data export or stable feed would complement the minimal UI well: it would let a quiet service stay intentionally simple without making a user's archive feel trapped.
reply
Barbing 12 hours ago
Impressed they already had a download! https://textlog.cc/account/edit

  Download your data
  Export your account, notes, connections, and activity as a JSON file.
-

btw you can write comments yourself Natalia! In fact that’ll keep ya compliant, we’re human-to-human here

reply
stagas 12 hours ago
Already there[0], and also an API[1] to build things on top! And it's all open-source[2], so if we miss something we can add it.

[0]: https://textlog.cc/account/edit

[1]: https://textlog.cc/api

[2]: https://github.com/stagas/textlog

reply
Natfan 13 hours ago
Claude ui
reply
stagas 7 hours ago
it's gpt 5.6 sol actually, credit where credit's due
reply
liberian 7 hours ago
[dead]
reply
stagas 13 hours ago
Thank you!
reply
Fudgel 3 hours ago
Im having trouble getting to the site when using quad9 dns. Site works fine when using cloudflare dns though.
reply
digitalWestie 14 hours ago
Yes! I've always said twitter was better before images/multimedia!
reply
chrononaut 13 hours ago
https://web.archive.org/web/20070123220857/http://twitter.co...

For those that never had an opportunity to see it.

reply
cgannett 13 hours ago
Old web vibes!
reply
knlb 12 hours ago
I recently started a section on my personal site for absolutely minimal and simple microblogging that I could Ctrl-F through: https://knlb.dev/scribbles/ -- I should probably give this a shot.
reply
stagas 12 hours ago
Hey, nice! If you want to try it, we have an API[0] you can pull your user feed from!

[0]: https://textlog.cc/api

reply
anoojb 13 hours ago
I really like this approach. I wonder if it needs such complexity for the rendering. Could you have built this as a SSG template?
reply
stagas 13 hours ago
Hi, thanks! There is a lot of nuance on the rendered pages, I figured server-side React was the best choice - plus it's a technology I'm comfortable with and might also encourage contributions.
reply
anoojb 13 hours ago
Would you be okay if I directed Claude to leverage your design and build a very simple Hugo template against it for my own personal use?
reply
stagas 13 hours ago
Why not, try it :)
reply
sentinel1909 5 hours ago
Signed up, will use it. Having trouble seeing how long this will actually exist though, because people are miserable and it WILL be ruined.
reply
BeetleB 14 hours ago
Reminds me of org-social (https://github.com/tanrax/org-social)

> Notes are limited to 280 characters. The constraint keeps them quick to write and read, making room for one thought at a time.

No thanks.

reply
stagas 14 hours ago
Hi, I'm sorry you don't like the limitation :( this is for short thoughts you want to share, not really huge conversations, there are better places for that IMO.
reply
BeetleB 8 hours ago
The character limit is, in my opinion, the primary reason Twitter became so bad. It encourages absolute language (qualifiers take up characters!) It discourages any level of nuance.

I use Mastodon which has a 500 limit, and even that sometimes is not enough.

reply
8by3 14 minutes ago
The opposite of short exists.

https://tuhat.net/about

Also open source.

reply
rowbin 5 hours ago
What do you mean with "became bad"? It started out with a 140 characters limit in 2006 and kept that for more than 10 years. So its the other way around: it became worse, when the character limit increased. Though I don't think its due to the character limit either way.
reply
BeetleB 4 hours ago
It was bad long before they increased the character limit.

Saying shitty/toxic stuff can be done concisely. Giving a nuanced response is simply not possible. So people respond with jokes/sarcasm/counter toxic stuff. And the cycle continues.

reply
childintime 11 hours ago
well, you may consider rewarding known quality users with an extended limit, say double. the others can pay ;)
reply
Gooblebrai 10 hours ago
That's how enshittification begins. Next thing you know and there are blue badges next to profiles.
reply
stagas 10 hours ago
lol Yes enshittification is the thing I want to avoid, so hard decisions need to be made that will not make everybody happy. Still, this is open-source[0], so we can open a discussion (ideally alongside a PR) and evolve it.

[0]: https://github.com/stagas/textlog

reply
stagas 10 hours ago
haha, yeah good idea. Also customize the theme as others wanted. So many opportunities here. :P
reply
andros 10 hours ago
[flagged]
reply
supermatt 13 hours ago
The 280 char limit seems arbitrary, given you cant even keep the about page within that limit: https://textlog.cc/about

If you are going to limit it to short posts, maybe the length of a short post is the length to limit it to, rather than emulating the 2xSMS of every twitter clone?

Other than that, it looks really clean and neat - I just dont think being 280 chars adds anything other than resulting in people posting with pagination as per X 1/3.

reply
helterskelter 12 hours ago
I like the idea of a shorter character limit as it nudges users to a specific mode of interaction: short thoughts/updates and not long-winded soliloquies. It's signalling that interaction with this platform doesn't demand much of your time or attention. I don't know what the about page has to do with it, but you have to draw the line somewhere.

That said, I'm not a social media user besides HN I guess.

reply
supermatt 10 hours ago
For perspective: you just commented 404 chars. Your first paragraph alone was 346.

My comment on the about page was that it needed more than 280 chars to communicate what the app is about - even the title + intro exceeds the limit.

If it is truly believed that 280 chars is enough to communicate an idea, then the about page should follow that philosophy.

reply
stagas 10 hours ago
I'm considering raising to 500. Care enough to open an issue[0] so that maybe there is a discussion we can track?

[0]: https://github.com/stagas/textlog/issues

reply
supermatt 9 hours ago
Honestly, I don't really care that much. The project looks like fun, and I wish you the best with it, but I don't really post on microblogging platforms myself.

I just wanted to give a bit of feedback as someone who reads them - and point out that on almost every twitter/bluesky submission to HN they are using ways to work around the 280/300 char limitations.

To play devils advocate - 500 also seems a bit arbitrary ;) If I were making a platform like this myself, I would go for a power of 2 that makes sense for storage/buffering. Maybe 1KiB including all meta, etc. You could comfortably fit a post the size of your about page, and all associated meta in that - even when serialised as JSON or something. I'd go from there and work backwards to come up with a size that has a real technical purpose.

reply
krapp 7 hours ago
Make it a setting and let people decide for themselves.
reply
stagas 13 hours ago
It needs to be short - there is already a limit that worked well - why bikeshed it more?
reply
supermatt 13 hours ago
A limit that worked well for who?

Almost every twitter/x post submitted to HN has people labelling their posts as "X of Y" threads, using images as text, or using pro account posts.

You can see it yourself: https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=twitter.com Ive just looked at 30 and each of them exceed 280 chars by far.

reply
Retr0id 13 hours ago
It works well for microbloggers.
reply
supermatt 13 hours ago
But clearly not the microbloggers on twitter/x, Bluesky, etc, who use the patterns I mentioned.
reply
Retr0id 11 hours ago
Those are definitionally not microbloggers. It's ok for a platform explicitly for microblogging to not cater to their macroblogging desires.
reply
supermatt 9 hours ago
Definitionally not?

"Microblogs, for example on Twitter..." https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/microblo...

"Some popular social networks such as X (formerly Twitter), Threads, Tumblr, Mastodon, and Bluesky can be viewed as collections of microblogs." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microblogging

reply
CitrusFruits 13 hours ago
I think this is the opposite of bikeshedding, it's literally a core feature and constraint.
reply
indigodaddy 11 hours ago
You could fork and do whatever no?
reply
supermatt 10 hours ago
Sure, but I don't care that much. It is a Show HN, so I was giving feedback.
reply
bryanhogan 12 hours ago
I built something for a similar goal, make it easy for someone to start their blog. But instead it's a static website, clone the repo, adjust the config.ts, write the posts in markdown, host anywhere: https://starter.bryanhogan.com/
reply
cube00 10 hours ago
reply
cheesecakegood 12 hours ago
I'm a certified dark mode hater, so in that light, that's a no-go for me: there seems to be no way to change the theme.
reply
stagas 12 hours ago
It picks up your system theme, so you can't be dark mode hater since you're already using it for your OS :P i didn't want to complicate it with user settings yet, but it can be added if there is demand.
reply
0cf8612b2e1e 12 hours ago
Maybe OP customized the system “dark theme” to be extra light.
reply
FroshKiller 12 hours ago
Doesn't your user agent support user stylesheets?
reply
equalbeforegod 6 hours ago
Should do the same but for 4chan.
reply
eighty8days 8 hours ago
reminds me of https://bearblog.dev/
reply
qudat 7 hours ago
https://prose.sh for an ssh app to manage a blog
reply
KomoD 58 minutes ago
(which is their service, and most of their comments are just promotion for their services)
reply
albertfranquesa 13 hours ago
i'm experiencing a weird scenario. all time is asking me for a magic link :( I click on that link and again the same screen, ask for a magic link (said the old one expired). It may be our mimecast blocking something?
reply
stagas 13 hours ago
Uhm maybe your client visits the magic link eagerly and when you visit it manually it's already been used?
reply
albertfranquesa 13 hours ago
i worked with my gmail but not corporate. mimecast does something wrong
reply
akkartik 13 hours ago
reply
andros 9 hours ago
I would like to invite you to read this article: https://en.andros.dev/blog/ba142044/twtxt-vs-org-social-the-... What do you think?
reply
akkartik 7 hours ago
Interesting! My biggest reaction is I don't use Emacs. Is Emacs a requirement? You're right that Org adds features but it also shrinks the pool of people who will try this.
reply
andros 3 hours ago
It's not necessary. I almost always use iOS.
reply
nbbaier 11 hours ago
I think twtxt is really cool. I have one on my site but I don't use it, unfortunately
reply
hndqbrg2uk 12 hours ago
Thanks for the write-up
reply
insane_dreamer 10 hours ago
twitter reborn

:thumbs-up:

reply
andros 9 hours ago
[dead]
reply
kindwords2026 7 hours ago
[flagged]
reply
extralongdivisi 11 hours ago
[dead]
reply