Government sponsored study on alcohol doesn't stand up to scrutiny: Nassim Taleb
26 points by scoofy 3 hours ago | 6 comments

newsomix9xl 2 hours ago
I am inclined to take Nassim's position as true, since it agrees with my desired beliefs: that moderate drinking is quite harmless, or if there are harms, they are outweighed by the benefits.

Modern medicine often gives us access to amazing drugs which have, in small print, a long list of associated, known, proven harms to our organs and health. The logic, as I understand it, is that the benefits of the drugs outweigh the harms.

The logic is not "that these drugs are harmless and possess only benefits".

reply
zmgsabst 2 hours ago
This is important when discussing (eg) cancer treatments: a treatment may leave you alive for longer but in worse health — and therefore, it’s unclear which is preferable.
reply
rapidaneurism 11 minutes ago
Arguably when left alive your health is by definition better than the alternative.

I suspect you mean the good health for a few months before death compared with a worse health during and after treatment. Still I had to make the quip.

reply
bamba890877 2 hours ago
[flagged]
reply
stevebmark 2 hours ago
[flagged]
reply
scoofy 2 hours ago
Nassim Taleb is not publishing AI garbage: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=64BtMdsAAAAJ&hl=en
reply
bpodgursky 2 hours ago
No, he is famous for publishing his own boutique handcrafted form of garbage.
reply
benatkin 2 hours ago
Flâneur psychosis?
reply