Chrome again exempts Google from user site data settings
191 points by ExMachina73 6 hours ago | 28 comments

fedpost 3 hours ago
It's okay, they're not a monopoly according to this administration. Nothing to see here, carry on!
reply
pavon 2 hours ago
This administration has done nothing to end or undermine the antitrust cases against Google. In both cases the judges found Google in violation of antitrust law, but both handed down fairly mild remedies, despite the administration (prosecutor) pushing for much stronger changes. The judges were appointed by Clinton (Leonie Brinkema) and Obama (Amit Mehta).
reply
Mountain_Skies 3 hours ago
Google and the rest of the billionaire class thank you for ensuring everyone is too divided by red/blue tribalism to ever have enough unity to mount a fight against them. Well done!
reply
asdf88990 3 hours ago
Exactly. It is like Google has only emerged during this administration with their shenanigans.
reply
8note 2 hours ago
iirc lina khan was appointed during the first trump admin and got most of her work done suing to split google during the biden admin?

you are a bit out of the loop if you think this is a partisan issue, or specifically one thats only there when trump is in charge

reply
thephyber 34 minutes ago
Using Lina Khan as an example (your only example?) undermines your point because she started upset Biden and was quickly fired after Trump 2 started.
reply
c0balt 2 hours ago
She got nominated by Biden in Biden's last term in March of 2021 and left in 2025 two weeks after Trump assumed office.

She did not get appointed under Trump nor did substantial work done under his administration.

Edit: I do not necessarily disagree with your comment on the partisan aspects of this issue. This is only meant to respond to the first paragraph.

reply
Zarathustra30 13 minutes ago
While I absolutely believe this, the author should include a control. Go to a different website that sets data, and show that it is deleted when Google data is not.
reply
mgiampapa 2 hours ago
I feel like the obvious thing to check here is that all chrome processes have terminated between tests. If it's still running some zombie process of course the data would persist.
reply
stkdump 20 minutes ago
It would still be a (albeit convenient for google) bug, as the setting indicates closing all windows as the trigger for deletion.
reply
frankacter 2 hours ago
At least on windows, closing chrome doesn't close the system tray process which keeps Chrome and Gemini prestaged and cached. Wonder if OP is experiencing a version of that on his Mac?
reply
Tempest1981 2 hours ago
Microsoft Edge does this too, iirc, for "Startup Boost".
reply
flyingshelf 2 hours ago
When you log into Google, you also log into Chrome. This means that you'll have a lot of exceptions for Google websites or else a "clear history" would log you out of Chrome.

Not justifying it (I don't use chrome) but that's likely what's happening here.

reply
ande-mnoc 2 hours ago
This is what the “Allow Chrome sign-in” setting is for and is turned off by the post author.
reply
demibabs 2 hours ago
In the article he explains he’s not signed into Chrome nor Google during the experiment.
reply
tjpnz 24 minutes ago
Google needs to be broken up.
reply
righthand 31 minutes ago
Google/Alphabet is a bunch of useful good intentioned services wrapped around an nonuseful evil analytics core/monopoly. The people who work with good intentions that “just want to build cool things”, protect the monopoly and the people with bad intentions, who work to empower Google’s monopoly.
reply
cute_boi 57 minutes ago
> all Google Search results are now opaque https://www.google.com/goto?url= garbage rather than the site URLs!

Can google justify why are they doing this? I wish google will die sooner if they start behaving like this.

reply
thinker34 2 hours ago
>> I’m personally inclined to cite Hanlon’s razor here rather than engage in conspiracy theories.

That is a likely case. Chrome is their closed source software unlike the Chromium browser.

reply
LastTrain 2 hours ago
Hanlon’s Razor applies to human behavior, not corporations.
reply
tehlike 2 hours ago
Engineers are humans.
reply
edoceo 2 hours ago
Corporations are not, they're made of humans but they behave worse than an individual.
reply
rectang 8 minutes ago
Fully agree. Humans are social animals who behave differently in different contexts, and the corporate context statistically ensures that the humans inside of it behave in all sorts of lamentable ways.
reply
isncjwjxjwnd 32 minutes ago
And who do you think makes these behavioural decisions? There is no “corporation”, there are, however, those currently on that company’s payroll.

It’s their fault. The people. The humans. The ones working there. The ones knowingly employing their knowledge in service of the company.

It’s always the humans.

reply
cute_boi 48 minutes ago
Politicians are also humans, everyone working for De Beers are also human... Please stop justifying egregious behavior from company who is destroying the fabric of internet with too many useless ads....And it isn't first time they are doing it, these "engineers" were the one who removed mv2 without better ad blocks in mv3.
reply
tehlike 20 minutes ago
1. ads are not useless. 2. without ads, there would be significantly less free content for people to read. 3. politicians are human too, but not the best of us except a few. Yes.

It's hip to say ads make things worse, but reality is often much more nuanced.

My original point being, many times an external person may think something is intentional when it may very well be a bug or may be there for a good reason.

I have observed a few of those both as an external person or an internal person.

reply
charcircuit 24 minutes ago
>useless ads

If the ads were useless, advertisers would not pay for them to exist.

>without better ad blocks in mv3

MV3 adblockers were built before MV2 was deprecated.

reply
cute_boi 18 minutes ago
Just for your info classic ublock style doesn't work on mv3. Google have severely limited adblocking in chrome now. They deprecated very late due to pressure from people, not out of goodwill.

Useless to users, not to advertisers. And, many people like me have never purchased any products after seeing ads at least on internet.

reply