Turn off and restrict access to Apple Intelligence features on Mac
89 points by alwillis 2 hours ago | 53 comments

zzyzxd 11 minutes ago
I would never have figured out the toggle for writing tools is in `Settings -> Screen Time -> Content & Privacy Restrictions -> Siri -> Writing Assistance`
reply
dburkland 2 minutes ago
The settings menus in recent iOS & macOS releases have been an absolute mess.
reply
fooker 2 minutes ago
It's searchable
reply
VCFundedGenYer 20 minutes ago
I want the disk space taken from the models back.

I will never touch this garbage and would rather use the disk space I purchased to be used for my purposes, not the industry's pointless fad bubble endeavors.

reply
mort96 2 minutes ago
Absolutely 100%. Now I'm very biased against this "AI" stuff in general, but even fans of "AI" can't want this, right? I mean I know some people who are heavy "AI" users and they all either have a setup with Cursor/Codex/Zed/VSCode/whatever or their preferred local model, they'd never ever want to use "whatever Apple happens to ship with the OS". Who's the target audience here?

It's investors isn't it.

reply
wartywhoa23 2 minutes ago
Same here!
reply
pdpi 40 minutes ago
Clearly, nobody at Apple is thinking globally about this stuff.

If you have kids, "Screen Time" is a reasonable enough name for the place where parental controls live.

If you work under the assumption that AI features are OK in general, but potentially problematic around kids in particular, parental controls are a reasonable enough place to put these AI controls.

If you're not a parent, and have broader concerns about AI, you'd never even think of looking for these options where they are.

reply
CodingJeebus 2 minutes ago
As someone who has spent a lot of time trying to configure my iOS/Mac experience to be more intentional/less addictive, I am intimately familiar with Screen Time at this point. And my gut says this isn't an oversight on Apple's part at all.

This is very intentional because in my experience, Apple's attempt at actually managing screen time and device access is mostly theater, and it absolutely tracks that they'd bury this config within Screen Time.

reply
k310 2 hours ago
This applies to MacOS 26.

On iOS 27, it looks like changing the settings for eight different apps taking 5 or 6 steps each.

https://archive.ph/AE72I#selection-712.0-731.53

Original: https://www.ithinkdiff.com/how-to-turn-off-apple-intelligenc...

reply
wartywhoa23 2 minutes ago
Apple, we want one global killswitch and a way to free disk space occupied by unused models.
reply
strictnein 58 minutes ago
The thing that's weird about Apple's "Intelligence" features is how dumb they are. I messaged one of my kids yesterday that the pizza I made was ready and that I was out in the backyard with our dogs. Genmoji (or whatever it's called) then decided to suggest that I make a new Emoji with pizzas in a yard.

It's great that they're on device and all, but how incredibly stupid.

reply
juancn 4 minutes ago
It's the price you pay for privacy
reply
coldpie 41 minutes ago
Many bothans died to bring you that suggestion to make a new emoji of pizzas in a yard.
reply
doc_ick 48 minutes ago
Still better then Microsoft.
reply
hatsix 9 minutes ago
I've never had Microsoft read a message, initiate an AI generation, then attempt to inject that into my conversation.

Not to say they wouldn't try...

reply
devmor 3 minutes ago
They’re too busy taking screenshots of your desktop every 2 seconds to datamine your interests in order to sell ads injected into the start menu.
reply
variety8675 8 minutes ago
Hopefully someone will make a script or small app to disable all of this in one click
reply
parable 47 minutes ago
Is it possible to block Apple Intelligence from sending data over the Internet via Little Snitch? I would assume it is, but I'm not sure if anything significant has changed in macOS 27 that makes this impossible now. I don't really mind the local features - I'd rather they stay disabled, but it's not the end of the world - but I really don't want any data leaving my Mac.
reply
reaperducer 23 minutes ago
Is it possible to block Apple Intelligence from sending data over the Internet via Little Snitch?

Short answer: Maybe, but I've never tried it.

Little Snitch is aware of various system-level network connections, but I don't know if they're granular enough to block the AI only.

reply
ActorNightly 45 minutes ago
Apple OS will bypass any user space firewall.

You can verify this yourself. Get an old laptop to act as a wifi hotspot and forward traffic over usb ethernet adapter to your actual router. Then run tcpdump on the computer. You will see the multitude of phone-home traffic.

reply
throwaway27448 12 minutes ago
Is there evidence of this anywhere on the internet? I couldn't find anything with ten minutes of searching, and I don't use little snitch, and I'm not going to put the effort in to remediate this just to figure out if this comment has weight.
reply
arcanemachiner 27 minutes ago
Non-macOS user here. Does macOS not let you run things as root?
reply
nhubbard 22 minutes ago
It does let you run things as root.
reply
VCFundedGenYer 19 minutes ago
Not exactly.

What is "root" in macOS is more or less a power user role. Apple took away the true ability to operate as root a long time ago with System Integrity Protection which walls off the critical parts of the OS from the user entirely.

Unfortunately, SIP also restricts basic system functions that are trivial in other OSes. Apple made this very difficult, and MS would have loved to do this in Vista had they not received the backlash that they did.

reply
frizlab 14 minutes ago
You can disable SIP if you want. You can run whatever you want on your machine. Disabling SIP is indeed a security risk… then again, so is running something as root. Having a Mac w/o SIP is no more a security risk than having a Linux w/o a r/o kernel AFAIK.
reply
todfox 10 minutes ago
The Write with Siri button that shows up whenever I select text is so obnoxious that I want to trash this fucking machine after 30+ years on the platform.
reply
reaperducer 25 minutes ago
Missing from Apple's list is the feature that suggest filenames.

At first, it was very cool and did a good job with plain text files, and even a PDF. Then it munged the names of several hundred files I was working with that was each named with a street address.

Finder → Settings → Suggest file names

reply
bflesch 2 hours ago
Funny how Apple has reached the crapware maturity level that Microsoft users are quite familiar with: After first boot, go through a long list of things to deactivate so that one can experience at least some feeling of agency and privacy when using your own hardware.
reply
throw0101c 33 minutes ago
> After first boot, go through a long list of things to deactivate so that one can experience at least some feeling of agency and privacy when using your own hardware.

The difference is that you can actually not set these things up: with Windows you often have to choice. Macs allow you to not have an iCloud account and run just fine without them, whereas to avoid a Microsoft cloud account there are magic CLI incantations that have to be invoked. And once you say "no", Apple generally leaves you alone.

I don't mind a bit of 'upsell' or informing (new) users of available offerings, as long as I get a choice.

reply
moose333 26 minutes ago
> Macs allow you to not have an iCloud account and run just fine without them

Until you need to install an app through the App store. Even a free app will refuse to install without an iCloud account. Frustrating when you want something with a verified source, for me it was Wireguard, and don't want to build it locally.

reply
throwaway27448 10 minutes ago
> Until you need to install an app through the App store.

Do you have an example of needing to go through the app store? There's apple's apps, I guess.

reply
reaperducer 21 minutes ago
That's on Wireguard.

If they can apt get on Ubuntu, they can likely brew install on macOS.

reply
butlike 22 minutes ago
The issue with iCloud is that before you even know it, you're paying $9.99/mo. Since 200gb is quite low, the next tier up is 2tb for $9.99, but then you're essentially locked in. I can't view the iCloud price tiers as anything other than predatory.
reply
throwaway27448 9 minutes ago
> The issue with iCloud is that before you even know it, you're paying $9.99/mo.

Sounds like the issue is you.

reply
ASalazarMX 47 minutes ago
I'd expect turning off Siri as a whole, which is very easy, would be enough. The list is for people who still want to use Siri after it became a OS-level LLM, I mean, Apple Intelligence.
reply
ryandrake 45 minutes ago
It's the "agency" bit that really annoys me. The Computer is no longer Personal. I expect my personal computer to only do things that I choose to invoke. It should not do a laundry list of things that the device manufacturer wants it to do, nor a laundry list of things the OS vendor wants it to do. I shouldn't have to turn things off. They shouldn't be on to begin with, unless I deliberately turned them on.

Of course this doesn't extend to obvious things like "running the kernel" and "initializing the filesystem." But in general I want to be the person responsible for running things, not some product manager 3,000 miles away in Silicon Valley.

reply
arcanemachiner 25 minutes ago
> The Computer is no longer Personal. I expect my personal computer to only do things that I choose to invoke.

The internet and its consequences have been a disaster for the personal computer user.

reply
Terr_ 7 minutes ago
Yeah, whatever happened to the personal computer, a kind of capital equipment available to the masses, something you own and can direct towards your goals and wellbeing?

Instead it's like we're sharecropping on a device companies have established as a colonial outpost to monitor us for profitable compliance.

reply
throwaway27448 11 minutes ago
Comparing apple intelligence to a service that records your screen without consent feels extremely disingenuous.
reply
JumpCrisscross 41 minutes ago
Why did they nerf the keyboard interface to Siri?

Before, it was ⌘⌘ and you could type out something for Siri to fuck up. Now, we have to turn off “Hey Siri” and then click on the Siri app or meander our way through Spotlight.

I talk to my phone. I type to my laptop.

reply
petu 30 minutes ago
> meander our way through Spotlight

By that you mean that just typing prompt into Spotlight doesn't work reliably? For me after few words "Ask Siri" is first result.

reply
wat10000 35 minutes ago
Cmd-space, type, done.
reply
lynndotpy 25 minutes ago
I'm not sure what configuration you have, but this does not send requests to Siri a-la the "cmd-cmd <type to siri>" flow.
reply
wat10000 3 minutes ago
It does as long as you've typed something that doesn't match an app. "Safari" and enter will open Safari. "What is safari" and enter will ask Siri the question and show the answer.
reply
Mindwipe 37 minutes ago
It's really frustrating that there is no ability to reclaim the drive space in MacOS 27, especially on Macbooks with M1 or M2 chips that can barely use the models. Another great sign of how the OS is deeply on fire IMO.
reply
rvz 8 minutes ago
Especially iPhones.

You can’t determine what is taking up space on your iPhone in the “system data” or “Other” section in iOS. The only way to “reduce” it is to restore and wipe the phone.

That is a scam.

reply
iAMkenough 2 hours ago
Note that storage space taken up by local models is not reclaimed and remains dormant on your Mac until you're nearly out of space.
reply
rgovostes 24 minutes ago
Philosophically, what is the difference between empty space and space that will be reclaimed when you need it?

The storage medium tracks whether a cell or sector is overwritable. The filesystem tracks whether a block is allocated. And the OS tracks whether a cache is evictable.

At what layer do you consider the space “claimed”?

reply
ProfessorLayton 5 minutes ago
I haven't run into this on macOS yet, but on iOS the space is not reclaimed in time to avoid running out of space even with Apple Intelligence turned off:

- Not enough space to update iOS without a computer tether, even though there would have been if that ~13GB on my phone was actually freed up. Instead I had to delete several GB on my phone.

- Recordings stopping due to lack of space, and again the 13GB LLM model on my phone was not removed before running into this.

I'm actually not where if/when I'll ever get my space back, and this is on iOS 26. It takes up even more space on iOS 27, and I don't have enough free space to waste on my 256GB phone.

reply
acuozzo 6 minutes ago
> Philosophically, what is the difference between empty space and space that will be reclaimed when you need it?

It makes large allocations fail which would have otherwise succeeded.

"When you need it" is a state you can only enter into, AFAICT, when you approach the limit gradually, not abruptly.

reply
kccqzy 11 minutes ago
In practice the difference is whether the code that does this reclaiming is actually working. I’ve never gotten my Mac into a low disk space situation (other than maybe in Leopard days) but on iOS, it is quite frequent for me to trigger a situation where the free space including purgeable space is many gigabytes but actual free space is nil. Trying to commit a transaction in a SQLite database in an app? Sorry you can’t, there’s no space left on device. Now go to settings and observe that you have 15 GB left (which includes purgeable space). Even SpringBoard has trouble showing icons. I do not trust Apple’s OS level disk space purging at all. I trust the filesystem and the storage medium more.
reply
paper2d 14 minutes ago
Realistically, the 'claim space' service needs to run when the OS 'thinks' it has run out of space to reclaim it. And there can be M amount of waiting time for this and N number of issues that may arrive with it.
reply
totetsu 2 hours ago
They cant take up that free space if it was already full in the first place..
reply