Palantir founder purchases large swath of forest in Sweden
98 points by davidja 2 hours ago | 75 comments

Jabbles 2 hours ago
Note that the red area on the map in the article is Härjedalen, which has an area of 11,405 km^2, 1.1M hectares, 2.8M acres.

The purchased forest (15k hectares, 37k acres) is therefore ~1.3% of the region.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%A4rjedalen

reply
izacus 3 minutes ago
That's ... huge.
reply
robin_reala 2 hours ago
That’s a strange map in the article. It makes it looks like he’s bought all of Härjedalen, rather than two orders of magnitude less. It’s still a chunky piece of land, but it’s definitely not that big.
reply
spankalee 21 minutes ago
If you believe in global threats from AI, global warming, Russia and/or China, this probably isn't a bad place to build a bunker.
reply
rafaelmn 54 seconds ago
You do realize that St Petersburg dot on the map is Russia ?
reply
dylanz 2 hours ago
He's a huge cross country skier so he probably wants his own little playground
reply
sorenjan 56 minutes ago
I don't know exactly where the land is, but according to media it's south of Storsjö kapell [0]. There's plenty of fell there, and he can't just build whatever he wants even if he owns the land. When a billionaire says he spent $22 million to by it for recreation, I don't see a big reason to not believe him, there's not much else he can use it for.

It's not far from Funäsdalen which is a relatively popular ski resort [1], there are also hiking trails and similar [2].

The seller SCA is Europe's biggest private forest owner and owns 2.7 million hectares by the way.

[0] https://maps.app.goo.gl/hQp2Rw9tM6kWTuTdA

[1] https://funasdalen.se/en/winter/skiing/cross-country-skiing/

[2] https://funasdalen.se/en/summer/hiking/

reply
stuaxo 28 minutes ago
It's easy to not believe because so many billionaires act with impunity and don't follow laws.

Billionaires associated with that company especially.

reply
thenayr 15 minutes ago
[dead]
reply
theropost 2 hours ago
Why does it quote 37,000 acres, then show a picture with a large swath of Sweden highlighted as if that is the area purchased - though Sweden is approximately 111 million acres of land, so this would be 0.003% of the land, so nowhere near the representation in this picture - seem disingenuous to me.
reply
loeg 32 minutes ago
Disingenuous sells more clicks, of course.
reply
bpodgursky 2 hours ago
$600/acre for timber forest???

I had no idea Sweden was this cheap. Why wouldn't he drop $22mm on this...

reply
sorenjan 53 minutes ago
Considering where it is it might be protected from logging, so the economic value of the land might be low. The seller is a paper manufacturer, so if they could get more value from it they would have charged more.
reply
Ekaros 2 hours ago
It is somewhat north. So I would expect potential income to be in line. Thus price can be relatively low and there still is not much profit.
reply
mahboi 2 hours ago
Guessing it's more expensive if you're buying less, otherwise I kinda want to buy 4 acres.
reply
robin_reala 2 hours ago
Cheapest I can find in Härjedalen with at least 4 acres is this 70 acre plot for 400k SEK or 40.2k USD: https://www.hemnet.se/bostad/gard-harjedalens-kommun-overber...
reply
s1artibartfast 36 minutes ago
not really comparable. That looks to a parcel with road and and nearby power access, within a few km of a small town that has an airport.

Quite cheap tho!

reply
nazgulsenpai 2 hours ago
Perhaps there's a reason Sweden wants him to have all of this land.
reply
Hikikomori 2 hours ago
No he can fuck off please
reply
khat 2 hours ago
[dead]
reply
moralestapia 2 hours ago
Nothing to see here. There's no corruption in the civilized world, even less in Nordic countries which are maximally developed culturally and socially.
reply
conorcleary 48 minutes ago
Probably as retaliation to SAAB.
reply
amelius 27 minutes ago
Why?
reply
nalekberov 2 hours ago
> Alex Karp, CEO of Palantir Technologies, purchased 15,000 hectares (37,000 acres) of forest in Härjedalen, Sweden, for 235 million kronor ($22 million).

Seems like he could buy all of Sweden's forests if he wanted to.

reply
NewJazz 2 hours ago
But would he still have Palantir? Also a large portion of thr forests are likely in public trust, and they'd be hesitant to sell all of it I'd think. Especially to one person with no track record of land management.
reply
Noe2097 47 minutes ago
Wow, that would make such a nice area to train (military) drones & robots, and in the middle of a country concerned by "noisy neighbors"

... Wait

reply
LucaFromAlpha 2 hours ago
what's that meme about rich people just doing really rich stuff and not worrying about being some BS worldly image? yeah that.
reply
tombert 6 minutes ago
I do not understand billionaires. I don't know why Alex Karp is buying large chunks of forests, the vast majority of which he will never see. I don't know why Larry Ellison is buying entire Hawaiian islands he'll never be able to fully use. I don't know understand the appeal of any of this shit.

Is it just that when you're worth billions, hoardings thousands of Steam games you'll never play isn't enough?

reply
OJFord 23 seconds ago
I think it can be lots of things: it's like any collector's item, it's a sort of bespoke investment, it's why not, it's if I own the whole thing I can just do as I please and not particularly worry about answering to anyone (e.g. re where I camp or when I fly there).

Forest in particular could well be pure investment though, it's not even a weird one, just capital intensive.

reply
blondie9x 2 hours ago
Do we know what the goal was? Was this to protect forest land? Similar to something like this? https://www.nicfi.no/2024/12/10/norway-strengthens-support-o...

Although I'm not sure what Norway is attempting is actually working - similar to what we see with carbon credits essentially showing no material decrease in greenhouse gas emission growth. Indonesia is going through some of the worst wildfires ever experienced in human history at the moment. https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cqevw9y34y34t

reply
newsclues 27 minutes ago
carbon credits? and skiing?
reply
NewJazz 55 minutes ago
Bunker.
reply
bigyabai 23 minutes ago
Nah. Sweden has much better places for bunkers than the forest, many of them pre-built into the mountains or on private property.

Given the current turmoil, building a bunker in the Swedish forest would be like building your porch underneath a tree with 50 beehives.

reply
bigbuppo 2 hours ago
I mean, the first thing I did when I came into money was buy a couple thousand acres of land.
reply
mertleee 2 hours ago
Assuming this is for conservation, it's hard to find reasons this is a bad thing.
reply
fnordpiglet 2 hours ago
This is where he will build 50 silos
reply
elias_t 2 hours ago
They probably already have nano technology
reply
xhevahir 2 hours ago
He's probably buying it so that he can ski through miles of virgin forest with his Norwegian bodyguards. I hate this weirdo but he's probably not going to do much to the landscape.
reply
eckelhesten 2 hours ago
Weak reason given that Sweden has something called Allemansrätten.
reply
gizajob 45 minutes ago
What about fences? I see that people have the right to roam but how are fenced-off areas dealt with?
reply
Hikikomori 2 hours ago
Let's hope people will use it and invade his land whenever he visits.
reply
defrost 37 minutes ago
Lagniappe: Mass trespass of Kinder Scout https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_trespass_of_Kinder_Scout
reply
subscribed 2 hours ago
This is a quite far fetched assumption.

I can't recall anything he said or did in the last few years that would make me assume he's done something good for the general public (or the humanity), and not for himself first and foremost.

reply
mahboi 2 hours ago
Why would Alex Karp randomly buy Swedish forest for conservation?
reply
xhevahir 2 hours ago
Skiing. He arranges his life around Nordic skiing to an incredible degree.
reply
fhdkweig 2 hours ago
I don't really know anything about skiing, but can you do that in a virgin old-growth forest?
reply
raddan 2 hours ago
Yes. All you really need are paths. This is a bit of an overgeneralization since forests in different places have different growth habits, but many old growth forests have less underbrush. During the winter, these forests are pretty easy to navigate on Nordic skis. If he wants to skate instead of doing the classic stride, I’m sure he can afford to groom the paths. Grooming really just requires a fancy snowmobile.
reply
sorenjan 51 minutes ago
reply
germinalphrase 2 hours ago
Potentially. Depending on the style of skiing, you may only need a 2-3 ft wide pathway. That said, ski paths tend to be cleared of trees/large rocks and span about 10-15 feet wide.
reply
rafram 2 hours ago
Who said it's a virgin old-growth forest?
reply
Ekaros 2 hours ago
I too doubt it is actually old-growth. Probably industrial forest. Which means that there is plenty of space around most of the trees.
reply
daneel_w 2 hours ago
It might not get to remain a virgin old-growth forest. If the Swedish logging companies can get away with it, he probably can, too.
reply
fragmede 41 minutes ago
Couldn't let the Netflix guy buy up the one in Utah and have bragging rights.
reply
JumpCrisscross 31 minutes ago
Alpine versus cross country.
reply
cryptolobster 2 hours ago
It still seems a bit strange
reply
mahboi 2 hours ago
Ok that makes a lot more sense
reply
fhdkweig 2 hours ago
Trying to buy himself back into heaven, like Bill Gates did. We only have the article's quotation for evidence, but it does say:

> Karp made the purchase through his newly registered company Cladonia Skog AB. The chairman of Cladonia told the Swedish newspaper that the land provides valuable habitat for wildlife and space for recreation.

reply
colordrops 2 hours ago
He plans to create a ground for hunting humans, a la "The Most Dangerous Game".
reply
moralestapia 2 hours ago
I wouldn't be surprised.

Karp strikes me as the type of person that would do this "for fun".

reply
unreal6 2 hours ago
reply
Naillik 2 hours ago
What are your reasons for assuming that would be the motive of the Palantir founder?
reply
jacquesm 2 hours ago
Why would you assume that?
reply
mcarper826 2 hours ago
agreed
reply
popalchemist 2 hours ago
why the hell would you assume altruism of the man who takes pride in killing people with automations
reply
silverFork 2 hours ago
Ai farm to be.. I suspect.
reply
david_shaw 2 hours ago
> Ai farm to be.. I suspect.

I suspect the opposite: a billionaire's escape from a potentially turbulent society.

reply
silverFork 2 hours ago
Could be.. zillionaires usually like mountains; I hear he can't drive; driving the boonies far from civilization is not that easy in the winter. He needs to buy a big shovel for the winter.
reply
john_strinlai 58 minutes ago
>I hear he can't drive; driving the boonies far from civilization is not that easy in the winter. He needs to buy a big shovel for the winter.

that's what helicopters are for.

-zillionaires, probably

reply
silverFork 49 minutes ago
He needs a landing strip for an aircraft. Helicopters are dangerous at night. No uber eats delivery there. We will see. It will take a decade to set it up.
reply
cheschire 31 minutes ago
Who needs Uber Eats when you can afford to house a personal chef on campus?
reply
silverFork 3 minutes ago
I guess he can afford it but why then would he move to boonies. Is he not going there to chop wood and take videos of the deer in the forest? Is it going to be a compound with people bending 90 degree and saying yes sir?
reply
tadasv 16 minutes ago
Lol, if we're talking about a scenario like this, do you think these billionaires are like Noah with their arc, just collecting people to survive? I cannot see a sane person joining them or not ratting them out if things really go bad.
reply
tadasv 18 minutes ago
I don't understand why people have this silly take that billionaires somehow will hide in the bunker and be fine. Do you really think that if we get to that point, they will happily live in a bunker by themselves lol. These people are unable to survive by themselves, let alone in a bunker. Do you think food and shit will get delivered to some random location just like that when shtf.
reply
fragmede 13 minutes ago
they have food and water to last decades in the bunker without needing external supplies. Why would they need to be supplied from the outside world? that's the entire point! (agree with the rest of your point though)
reply
ZYbCRq22HbJ2y7 52 minutes ago
or... just plain old land speculation?
reply
silverFork 37 minutes ago
Yup it could be but speculation needs a cause.. Hard assets are the rage right now anyways for AI zillionaires. He has apparently bought a monastery in Colorado for $120M; Miami beach house for $55M; 500 acre land in New Hampshire. His net worth is about $20B, $22M is like buying a toy to him and it is not a major investment.
reply
eichin 2 hours ago
Maybe he wants his own version of Nathan's estate in Ex Machina (redditor calculations from in-movie clues put it at 7 million hectares, though, so this isn't even close :-)
reply