Almost. They just need a context/semantic layer to ensure query correctness and some kind of artifact for publishing findings and visualizations.
We built an open source project called Graphene that provides these tools:
- Semantic layer that’s more token-efficient than YAML, more deterministic than Markdown (eg, composable, callable metric macros), with a query API that’s well in-distribution (SQL). - MDX-like files for dashboards (Markdown with inlined SQL + HTML components for viz with support for CSS and Javascript) - Connects to popular data warehouses or local DuckDB
Your coding agent will build really in-depth reports and can ofc leverage any other skills or context that you've made available to it. We dogfood it inside a monorepo with our website, app source code, planning docs, etc so the agent has access to a ton of context. It’s also nice that the agent can add instrumentation, adjust pipelines and transformations, and add dashboards all in one PR.
If you want to try it out, just point your coding agent at https://github.com/graphene-data/graphene/blob/main/docs/set... and ask it to set up Graphene.
If you don’t have data to play with, you can clone our example project:
1. `git clone <https://github.com/graphene-data/example-flights.git`> 2. `cd example-flights && npm install`
Would love any/all feedback!
Graphene for most of us here already means Graphene OS.
It feels off that as community members you either didn’t know this or just straight up chose ignore this or worse; chose to ride their brand; even if it’s technically allowed doesn’t mean everyone likes what your doing. It’s just mental overload with an avoidable namespace conflict.
TLDR; ask the LLM for a new name. Change it now when it’s low stakes.
And for the rest, it is probably the actual Graphene as in the material [1]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphene
That being said, given the AI context, it does sound pretty shortsighted to choose an overly saturated existing name for your new product. AI agents or LLM chat bots will definitely be confused with prompts like "hey what's this graphene project?". Dunno how tthey missed that.
Annnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnyways.
I suspect if the question was put to the LLM itself it would have flagged this. Somewhat ironic.