Ok, I respect your opinion, but remember that there are poor souls like me out there that actually love the opposite.
All things being equal, why prefer Docker Compose? From my perspective, a single binary strictly dominates any Docker Compose solution.
Easy to migrate to new system.
Easy to upgrade and downgrade. When a new version causes an issue just restart it with an older version.
One directory to backup and restore that contains all the services and their settings.
Don't have to look at cli docs to figure out how to run it.
Doesn't have access to my file system, logs are easy.
I think you can go very very far with this kind of setup especially if it's just for you.
I self host on a bunch of different hardware, OSes, providers. I want the least fiddling as possible.
Self-hosting email fully is tedious/unnecessary, but what you can do is mirror your various inboxes (Gmail, iCloud, proton, non-corporate outlook) with mbsync and use roundcube or some other frontend to view emails and compose.
I use this to easily access mail from different services, and I can also send from any of them.
I also have a seperate service that watches the mail directory and sends a ntfy.sh notification for new emails.
It’s a bit complicated cause theres so many services but here are the quadlets: https://github.com/ebrahim37/infra-template/tree/main/homela...
I implemented this about a month ago because the iphone Mail app was increasingly buggy.
If you IT, why do you particularly consider self hosting email as tedious?
Would absolutely love to do this, proton frontend annoys me at times.
mbsync mirrors your protonmail inbox to disk, dovecot hosts IMAP on your server, and roundcube or some other frontend connects to dovecot.
For gmail/icloud IMAP, you can't use your regular account password, you have to create an "app password" and use that password for mbsync.
I am also using Vikunja instead of trello.
Tbh in general I am fine if the self hosted app uses postgres or a container Db instead of sqlite only.
Pangolin was the missing piece I needed, to not expose my servers to the internet and easily have my services publicly accessible with built in auth.
Tailscale kind of worked, but it was a hassle needing the client on mobile device and it being a VPN.
With vibe coding, I have more of my own apps running than pre-built.
DynamicUser and ProtectSystem keep me sane.
My jellyfin LXC idles at a few hundred megs of ram, shares the base debian kernel, and if anyone does ever break in, they don't get access to anything else, anywhere else on my server. (All media is also mounted read-only to the jellyfin LXC.)
I really, really like it, just set it up recently. Everything in its right place.
The advantage is that if I do want a specific feature, I can just add it, and I am never worried about subscription limits or surprise charged, because I host it on a fixed-cost VPS.
Things don't really need maintenance and don't really break by themselves, the only time when they can sometimes break is when changing things.
You do need to have a proper setup though, for stuff like disk space alerts, knowing the common gotchas of disabling settings that can cause issues, etc.
[0]: https://uxwizz.com
Would love to know as I wanted to do the same in the past and ended up self signing certs.
They are so easy / portable but perhaps systemd is a better option as the author suggests.
For us it's the perfect balance between simplicity, observability (Beszel) and reliability. Not the right tool if you have dynamic workloads but definitely the right tool for boring and predictable workloads.
At home I run K3S, it's awesome. It also breaks a lot and does add a whole bunch of complexity that I would only recommend if you enjoy tinkering and fixing things.
rsync data directories. docker compose up. Done.
On the consumer or even prosumer nas products which have a semi-locked down system (ie Truenas/qnap/Synology). Technically you have root but as soon as you update the OS all/most of the changes end up being broken. Yes you could probably do something and deal with it. But personally I've spent too long babysitting it on the first and second nas that I no longer care.
The hardware to accomplish most things that we rely on from cloud vendors is absolutely trivial. My own home server is a used super cheap and tiny machine. The hard disks don't even fit in the box and yet it has plenty of CPU and memory to spare.
The software is getting easier to configure year after year eventually creeping to the point where elderly people too lost to use a remote will be running this stuff. The real challenge will be solving for easy access to private networks from public spaces across the internet. Right now everybody seems to be centering on vendor solutions like TailScale for this.
And believing that the current AI economy might have a period of rapid devaluation in the near future is pretty reasonable. But, much like the original .com bubble, the idea that AI as a technology will not survive and thrive through such a pop, and become an ever more important part of our future, is a belief that I can't comprehend. Anthropic and OpenAI very well may go belly up. AI as a technology isn't going anywhere.
And as much as I'd like to believe that more people may self host more things in the future, self hosting will never, even if it was adopted by literally everyone, become as big a deal as AI, even if AI hit a wall tomorrow and didn't get any better than the current frontier models.
At first it was hard but then i made it into a product. I am working on Tarvis.io which makes self hosting accessible to non technical users as well. It comes with installation assistant, ssl domains and backups inbuilt into it.
You can install open source apps from a catalog or drop any github repo and it installs and run it for you.
With Tarvis, I have been self hosting more since I am able to install and delete apps with one click, it makes it easy to try things.
I just checked on my *arr stack. Sonarr and Radarr idle at 157MB and 159MB of memory and approximately no CPU. Jellyfin currently idles at 330MB. I'm not sure where you got this impression from. I grant these tools are complicated and have somewhat clumsy UX, but they aren't especially heavy to run and are not fragile.
OP, point your :robot: at https://github.com/subdavis/selfhosted/blob/main/docker-comp... and ask for an explanation. It's a single compose file that illustrates how the *arrs, transmission, and jellyfin all work together. I'm sure you can set it up :)
First was Lidarr went for months last year (was it this year?) unable to search/add musicians due to complications with how they were relaying those searches. It took them a long time to refactor that part of the software and make it usable again.
Second was the retirement of Readarr, the ebook-version of this software, which was an absolute shame.
But aside from that this is pretty much set-and-forget software. Although the setting is harder than it should be, should be much easier to favour smallest x265 rips at <resolution>, lossless audio, season rips with subtitles.
Here is the stack I recommend:
* Radarr (movies) with optional second instance for 4K versions
* Sonarr (shows) with optional second instance for 4K versions
* Sonarr (anime), separate instance to have control over quality settings
* Prowlarr (tracker/indexer management)
* SABnzbd (Usenet)
* qBittorrent (torrents)
I would also recommend consulting the TRaSH guide to tune your setup and ensure you’re grabbing quality releases. From there, the next logical step is Profilarr :)
Highly recommend them to OP. My stack went down once in the past 4 years and it was my fault.