Llama.cpp on a jailbroken PS5: run any GGUF model natively on the console
78 points by Anon84 3 hours ago | 25 comments
xnx 17 minutes ago
I've never even considered getting a PS5, but hackers converting a locked-down appliance into a general purpose computer has me really reconsidering.
replyRabbit504030201 38 minutes ago
The project's primary site should not be GitHub, and I am serious. Playstation 5 is not some historical curiosity and Sony might strike the page down any hour now.
replyThose projects should default to hosts less geared toward corporate governancy; custom internet domain being the first requirement.
LoganDark 3 minutes ago
> Those projects should default to hosts less geared toward corporate governancy; custom internet domain being the first requirement.
replyI struggle to think of anywhere on the entire open internet you could put something like this where it could not be taken down.
Retr0id 21 minutes ago
I'm sure Sony has an opinion of the jailbreaks that enable this, but they really don't give a shit about anyone running llama.cpp. Why would they? They're just glad you're not pirating games.
replyxp84 13 minutes ago
Is there a real or imagined hardware subsidy on the PS5 hardware though? In other words, is the current MSRP below what Sony would charge in a hypothetical world where they weren’t involved in any form of gaming software business, with an assumption that they will make additional margin dollars from game sales? I can see some manager making the case that repurposing the hardware for non-gaming use is taking food off his family’s table, in a manner of speaking. If so, it’s an argument that you don’t want this type of use to become popular and have PS5s start flying off shelves and never having games bought for them.
replypwython 46 minutes ago
With this in mind, having LLM-powered NPCs would be a beautiful thing. There's been limited testing on PC games (PUBG Ally), but I can imagine it will be the standard.
replydrewg123 39 minutes ago
For somebody who hasn't kept up with all the different open source models and what token rates mean, how would using this compare to something like codex or claude? I assume it would be much slower and less capable..?
replyrobotswantdata 30 minutes ago
Significantly slower and less capable than opus 5.5
replyHowever you can run comparable or better models than gpt4. Try to stay under 30b
kevmo314 2 hours ago
Not long until Anthropic's dreams of self-replicating models starts taking over PS5s!
replyrandomblock1 2 hours ago
replyrussellbeattie 2 hours ago
Obligatory... "Can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of these?"
replyAnon84 2 hours ago
Those were relatively big for scientific computing in the PS2 days
replyhttps://www.ncsa.illinois.edu/2003/05/27/playing-the-superco...
ThrowawayTestr 2 hours ago
11.4G of shared memory. Could do something interesting if you don't have a GPU.
reply
And at that price point or a little bit more you might as well just get an RTX 3060 and save yourself a lot of hassle (you also get DLSS, DLAA etc.)