StackOverflow now gets fewer than 1000 questions a month
58 points by babelfish 2 hours ago | 49 comments

EvanAnderson 14 minutes ago
I miss Server Fault-- more the time in my life, I suppose, than the site itself.

I enjoyed the hell out of answering questions on Server Fault for a few years. It came along around the time my teaching gig at the local community college transitioned to online-only classes (which, oddly enough, I couldn't find enthusiasm to teach). I feel like the Server Fault community tried to make it a more hospitable place than Stack Overflow, FWIW, back in the day.

When Stack Exchange added the realtime chat system I got into interacting with members of the community more than could be done in questions or comments. There were even a couple people who ended up being IRL acquaintances. There were also wacky hijinks, too: https://meta.serverfault.com/a/1854 (I'm agog that those things happened 15 years ago, too... Yikes!)

Then we had our daughter and my time to dedicate to the site became scarce. I knew it was in the cards for me to lose the top spot on the leaderboard so I decided to just pack it in and quit cold turkey. I think I'm still fairly high on the leaderboard but, other than occasionally getting search engine results that point me to the site, I've stayed away. I don't live there anymore, as it were.

Edit: My favorite part of the site was having friends and Customers tell me about times they'd search-engined a question and found themselves using one of my answers to solve their problem. At least one Customer was amused to discover I'd fictionalized their particular situation as an example in an answer.

Tons of fun. Yep-- I miss that community.

reply
cowlevel 18 minutes ago
You're underselling it. It's less than in their second month of existence - and that has been true every month for the past year. For the last few months it's also lower than their first month. Stack Overflow, effectively, no longer exists.

And we know why. It's because of their hostile attitude towards their users.

No doubt they'll continue operating until there's no more value in selling AI data licenses, then they'll unplug the servers and unregister the business.

reply
NichoPaolucci 15 minutes ago
Well, the community never made it a very welcoming place... But, I think a part of this is that it's just faster to throw a Q into ChatGPT. There's no waiting for a response, a major bonus is the non-hostility + willingness to respond to 'stupid' questions.
reply
p-e-w 10 minutes ago
> And we know why. It's because of their hostile attitude towards their users.

Uh, no.

StackOverflow is and has long been one of the most hostile places on the web, I’m not denying that. But this unprecedented drop in activity is 100% because of AI. Their product is as obsolete as horse-drawn carriages.

reply
avereveard 5 minutes ago
https://www.ericholscher.com/blog/2025/jan/21/stack-overflow...

It was dying well before AI and while a knee happened coincidentally to chatgpt release, I don't think you remember correctly what gpt answer looked like for programmers questions back then. It was much later where it started assisting development.

reply
raincole 38 seconds ago
It doesn't matter. Even if it were the most friendly community ever, as long as their core value were the same - answering programming questions that with clear answers - it would have been replaced by today's AI completely. How GPT3.5 bad was isn't relevant today.
reply
999900000999 27 minutes ago
Well, I always found SO to be an intensely hostile community. Chat GPT doesn't ban you for asking which IDE to use
reply
hatthew 12 minutes ago
SO wasn't a discussion forum, it was wikipedia for programming. It was already dying long before the question rate dropped off, since most new questions were "plz write/debug my code for me" which tend to be the sort of question that SO was not designed for. Chatgpt replaced that, and github issues replaced project-specific debugging. Now there's nobody left to write/read/answer the small amount of questions that are still a good fit.
reply
p-e-w 7 minutes ago
> SO wasn't a discussion forum, it was wikipedia for programming.

They changed what they wanted to be multiple times, and even after they had settled on a policy they didn’t enforce it consistently.

reply
tintor 24 minutes ago
ChatGPT bans you for asking it to list all malware that comes with your Samsung TV, or anything biotech related.
reply
gerdesj 16 minutes ago
Does it really? I'm not going to mess with biotech because I have no idea what I am on about there. I did ask about Samsung TVs:

https://chatgpt.com/share/6ae2955c-9ff0-83eb-9ad4-e936f99db8...

reply
ProphetOfParado 8 minutes ago
[flagged]
reply
gnabgib 2 hours ago
Related discussion What AI did to stackoverflow in a graph (483 points, 3 months ago, 595 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48956949
reply
cowlevel 19 minutes ago
AI didn't do it to SO. SO's new ownership did it to SO. It's a hostile place with or without AI.
reply
armchairhacker 40 minutes ago
SO has been useless for years now, but the other Stack Exchanges can be interesting, they deserve more spotlight.
reply
kulahan 16 minutes ago
I really do love their other communities so much more. Lots of super interesting content - it feels like a new digg or something. I go to one of the other stacks and look at the most popular non-tech stack posts once or twice a week purely for entertainment. The breakdowns on obscure but interesting topics can get really fun to read!
reply
EvanAnderson 2 minutes ago
On the more-and-more rare occasion that I end up on Stack Overflow as a result of a search I find myself losing excessive time to following the random links to other communities. The other communities really are good stuff.
reply
faangguyindia 10 minutes ago
Reddit is going the same way.

I know many people who have got banned and never managed to get back on Reddit because Reddit is using some very invasive and persistent banned user detection techniques.

Thing is, they use AI to ban people; over time, many false positives accumulate and not everyone has the time and energy to appeal bans.

Slowly, more and more user accounts get banned, and even technical people I know fail to make a new account which lasts more than 3-4 days.

But the Reddit management is seeing this as a "win," not able to see the consequence of doing this.

reply
gwerbin 2 minutes ago
I stopped using Reddit not because I got banned, but because it has been steadily converted from the world's most popular forum platform to a trash heap of engagement hacks and shady practices. Moreso than SO, which was already struggling with existential problems before AI, Reddit did itself in.
reply
namrog84 4 minutes ago
There was that 1 person who used to work(paid?/volunteer?) at Reddit that actively tried to cultivate high-quality AMA on Reddit. Ever since they've been gone. It hasn't felt the same.

Some amount of hope and optimism that was around has definitely dried up or at least moved elsewhere into other smaller communities.

Everything is overly centralized around a particular influencer/podcaster/celebrity/product or whatever nowadays, it's harder to find topic based or open community-based places. The other places still exist, but still difficult to find and keep going.

I do hope the pendulum swings back towards hopeful optimistic culturally rich community vibes in many digital spaces.

reply
luqtas 6 minutes ago
and hopefully soon we have decentralized protocols as the standard when we think about user spaces. amen
reply
werdnapk 35 minutes ago
And how much was AI trained on their data? That's the sad part. Nobody asking new questions, so not much more for AI to train from.
reply
sureMan6 31 minutes ago
It's training on every single codebase in the world instead now

You prompt it to fix the mistakes it made and that goes into the new training data

reply
mburns 22 minutes ago
FWIW, StackOverflow posts are licensed under Creative Commons BY-SA v4.0, same as Wikipedia.
reply
philsquared_ 32 minutes ago
With or without training they would have gotten eaten.
reply
poszlem 29 minutes ago
There is a difference between dying tomorrow and dying in 5 years.
reply
ahartmetz 30 minutes ago
Why?
reply
hatthew 8 minutes ago
The golden age of SO was when all the important questions that have accumulated over decades were getting asked and answered. SO stabilized once that backlog got finished, and then started dying once people moved to github issues for project-specific questions. Chatgpt just replaced the last remaining type of questions ("plz do my work for me"), which arguably shouldn't have been getting asked in the first place.
reply
SyneRyder 16 minutes ago
The peak number of questions was in 2013, and they had roughly zero growth between 2013 & 2016. They were in decline long before LLMs were on the scene.
reply
pseudosavant 30 minutes ago
Wow, what a steep drop off. They've gotten fewer questions over the last year than they averaged per month in 2024.
reply
pseudosavant 23 minutes ago
I put it in a quick chart to make the rise and fall more visual. https://imgur.com/a/046CfZ2
reply
kstrauser 16 minutes ago
How is that different from clicking the Graph tab on that page? https://data.stackexchange.com/stackoverflow/query/1925371/n...
reply
zer00eyz 10 minutes ago
All I could think of when I looked at that is "Oh this is gonna be how Nvidia's chart looks some day soon(ish)"
reply
kstrauser 17 minutes ago
And here's why: https://honeypot.net/2026/10/09/what-really-killed-stack-ove...

LLMs are most commonly blamed, but the drop started way before those became popular. I'm confident that its horrid moderation drove people away long before AI had a chance to. Nothing's quite as demoralizing as:

Q: Why does adding two Python objects fails although their classes are compatible?

A: [closed as a duplicate of "Why do people say JavaScript is weakly typed?"]

I'm a reasonably bright person, with scads of StackOverflow fake-karma-Internet-points, but even I gave up trying to ask a question. There just aren't enough hours in the day to fight with hermits seeking the Ultimate Question and downvoting everything else.

reply
ChicagoDave 10 minutes ago
If there is any proof that no one will be writing code, this is it.

I encourage all young developers to focus on information architecture, application architecture, pure logic, domain-driven design, and harness engineering.

reply
Vaslo 6 minutes ago
I answered a number of questions on there. Some non-native English speaker started going my answers and making language editing suggestions. The grammar was fine. I refused all the changes because they were at best basically the same or at worst incorrect. I refused maybe 4-5. The next day the guy got on and had done a bunch more then went to some of my answers and made hostile comments about my answers on simple things like Pandas for Python.

That was that for that site.

reply
mawadev 19 minutes ago
I have some wishful thinking for everyone reading this: what if the people at StackOverflow built one of the best bot protections out there? I would honestly expect the graph to go up with all the LLMs and automated content spamming..
reply
cowlevel 15 minutes ago
The graph doesn't include Stack Overflow for Agents, which is a real product that exists for some reason.
reply
amacalac 2 hours ago
They get that many?!
reply
esafak 31 minutes ago
It is sad because it was such a well designed community. But its lessons live on.
reply
kstrauser 14 minutes ago
Nah. It launched well, but sorely needed a BDFL. Almost without fail, services that delegate moderation duties to users are ruined. Inevitably, well-meaning people form councils and boards, and then those get taken over by people with nothing but time on their hands. It's the same thing that happens with school boards and HOAs: the last people you want running them are the ones that have the time and the drive to actually want to be in charge of them.
reply
nullsanity 10 minutes ago
[dead]
reply
jdthorpe 7 minutes ago
It was an AMAZING community... right up until it wasn't. I cut my teeth on trying to answer questions and learned how much I didn't know when other people's answers were better than mine. Literally made a career out of what I learned there, and I thoroughly enjoyed welcoming people to SO and encouraging new coders to keep learning. But then dang, the question purists and eager close-every-question jocks came to dominate the platform and made it no fun to ask or answer. Even if AI was never a thing, the change in culture probably would have opened the doors to a competitor.
reply
hackersnooze1 16 minutes ago
does well designed mean rotten and pointlessly hostile
reply
reassess_blind 29 minutes ago
StackOverflow helped build the LLMs that replaced it.
reply
paulddraper 34 minutes ago
The highly technical sites -- StackOverflow, Unix & Linux, MathOverflow -- see little use.

Others like SciFi & Fantasy and Worldbuilding have kept relevance.

Unfortunately, these more niche sites relied on StackOverflow to drive referral traffic, so the whole platform is declining.

reply
paulpauper 39 minutes ago
I am amazed it's still that high
reply
cebert 2 hours ago
I don’t think they’re gonna be long for the world
reply
hackersnooze1 17 minutes ago
good riddance.
reply
6510 30 minutes ago
This question has already been asked?

Pages bloated like myspace make me reluctant to click the search result and I wont browse around if a website doesn't load instantly. Search some exotic kind of bad. That they haven't implemented an LLM is quite untechnological.

It should have an LLM assist with constructing the questions and it should have answers from all providers willing to donate tokens. Upvotes should generate wonderful data on how to construct an answer.

reply
chasil 31 minutes ago
The riddle was: "What walks on four feet in the morning, two in the afternoon and three at night?".

Oedipus answered: "Man: as an infant, he crawls on all fours; as an adult, he walks on two legs and; in old age, he uses a walking stick".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oedipus_and_the_Sphinx

reply