Inkling 2 Small
174 points by Philpax 8 hours ago | 60 comments

Jackobrien 7 hours ago
The best open models today have been “good enough” to do most knowledge work for a few months. This might be the first US one good enough too. That’s a big deal.

Open weight US based Opus 5.5 within 12 months.

reply
npc99 6 hours ago
Inception Mercury 3 and Particle-1's model are also good.

(I am assuming Inception is an American company, not sure TBH)

reply
ray__ 6 hours ago
Agree, Mercury 3 is one of my favorite models right now...the speed is such a quality of life improvement.
reply
martincsweiss 5 hours ago
Really? I'm surprised. What do you use it for?

My read on Diffusion LLMs has been that it's cool tech, but only useful for things like like code autocomplete or editing a block of text.

They don't beat autoregressive models on quality per compute, assuming you are serving lots of users and can batch requests.

reply
serf 5 hours ago
MoA schemes that use proposers/task-separation/supervisory roles can still benefit from very fast diffusion models like mercury, the overall speed doesn't have to be bottle-necked by the slowest model -- that depends on the arrangement it's deployed in.

but to your point , yeah diffusion models can be kind of brain dead without proper coaxing.

my ideal arrangement is a smarter/bigger model supervising lots of proposals from diffusion models. The diffusion models spit out a big proposal each, the bigger model can vet something as minor as the headline or filename for each proposal, time still ends up being saved.

reply
freakynit 4 hours ago
Sorry to put it bluntly, but, Mercury is sh*t in comparison. And I have genuinely tried a few times to use it since the speed is so good. But nop.. it just isn't there.
reply
johnshahbazian 3 hours ago
For my own purposes, I found Mercury Decide to be excellent. Better than Jev at what I threw at it. Inception did a really great job with it.
reply
flipbrad 57 minutes ago
Thanks for your review, 15 day old HN account that likes praising Mercury services.
reply
kadoban 7 hours ago
> Open weight US based Opus 5.5 within 12 months.

Seems unlikely. Maybe open weight at all near there? That'd be great.

reply
wolttam 6 hours ago
People say this about the frontier every time, and the open models catch up in a matter of months every time.
reply
kadoban 6 hours ago
The open models catch up, the _US_ open models catch up much more slowly. Different incentives and cultures.
reply
p-e-w 7 hours ago
Why does that seem unlikely? The difference between frontier and open weights has been much less than 12 months for a while now.
reply
satvikpendem 7 hours ago
US open weights are much worse, way more than 12 months apart compared to frontier.
reply
kadoban 6 hours ago
> Why does that seem unlikely? The difference between frontier and open weights has been much less than 12 months for a while now.

Frontier and open weights? Yes.

Frontier and _US_ open weights? No.

I'd expect a US open weights provider to suddenly get bought or go non-open if they get near Opus 5.5 anyway.

reply
nghiemphucminh7 6 hours ago
[flagged]
reply
josh-wrale 5 hours ago
Muse Glimmer is pretty good.
reply
BOOSTERHIDROGEN 3 hours ago
Could you give some examples what makes them good, thanks
reply
walrus01 3 hours ago
Things have been remarkably "not terrible" since approximately the release of Laguna S 2.1 a while back in early summer 2026, which is now outdated within the past 6 month time frame by other, better non CN open weight models.

I'm not saying that any of them are to the level as a deepseek v4.1 flash 1017 or similar but they're catching up. The most recent huge mistral release is also grounds for an optimistic view.

reply
gigatexal 4 hours ago
That’d be the inflection point I’m waiting for!
reply
agentdev001 5 hours ago
I give it 2.
reply
epsteingpt 7 hours ago
It's a nice, domestic open weight model.

Without hundreds of millions in 9 days a small team is producing a model that can beat DeepSeek 4.1 and a platform to tune it.

Optimistic for the future.

reply
alexandra_au 27 minutes ago
It doesn't beat DS v4.1, and they have so much more compute capacity than any Chinese company, yet still cannot even beat MiniMax M3.1 Flash (220B) despite having 2.7x more parameters (596B).
reply
explosion-s 5 hours ago
Correctly if I’m wrong but isn’t inkling made by a very well funded startup from an ex - OpenAI exec iirc?
reply
arcticbull 4 hours ago
Yes, Mira Murati's Thinking Machines. They are apparently trying to raise $5B at $40B, after raising $2B at $10B last year.
reply
markasoftware 4 hours ago
Not beating dsv4.1 at all
reply
lifeisloving 5 hours ago
If you cant beat Deepseek on price im not using it. I actually dont care about beating DS in capabilities, I dont think you need more intelligence than Deepseek for 99% of the things people work on, and I dont want LLMs to do everything, that kind of defeats the point. I just need a smart fuzzer and to offload some tedious busy work.

So why should I pay for 3-20x more for a few small percentage points in preformance. (I would prefer DS did some things better, but largely I can force my desired behavior), but I could only have access to Deepseek 4.1 and still beat almost everyone using opus/fable/astra on a productivity basis, I need automation tools not "do my entire job so Im worthless tools", and DS has already more than gotten there for me.

reply
ares623 21 minutes ago
Are they distilling from the big labs or Chinese labs at all? In that case isn't it $1 trillion frontier CAPEX + Inkling's costs for the total costs.

"I bought this house with my own savings plus a small million dollar loan from mum and dad."

reply
swid 58 seconds ago
Everyone is building on everything that comes before.

Houses are not built from scratch either. The know-how, power, water, roads, materials…

reply
itkovian_ 5 hours ago
The most important thing here is training was entirely nvfp4 - this is best model by far that has ever been trained in that precision and explains why they were able to do it so fast
reply
boredatoms 2 hours ago
Oh nice they’ll run well on sparks

edit: nm I see its a bit big

reply
a11r 7 hours ago
Very refreshing to see benchmarks where the reporting team is not the clear winner. They are claiming to be better than GLM 5.3 flash, which is impressive if it holds up outside of benchmarks.
reply
maelito 22 minutes ago
Looks better than mistral 4 on all benchmarks ?
reply
tcdent 8 hours ago
Is it SOTA yet? No. Are the domestic open weights labs demonstrating incredible velocity? Undeniably.
reply
bensyverson 4 hours ago
Seems to be pretty close to SOTA on design. I’m excited to try it out with my agentic design system.
reply
bashtoni 8 hours ago
Distillation is the tide that lifts all boats
reply
epsteingpt 7 hours ago
Imagine if Mira Murati and John Schulman actually know what they're doing?
reply
tcdent 7 hours ago
Given the time to market and the date in which these labs were founded, I find it far more likely that the lag was representative of them establishing proper internal (RL etc) tooling.
reply
syntaxing 7 hours ago
I can’t seem to find the cost? The craziness of deepseek flash 1017 is how ridiculously cheap it is for how capable it is.
reply
Bolwin 7 hours ago
AA lists it as $0.30/0.03/1 and cost per task is $1.18, about double that of deepseek
reply
syntaxing 7 hours ago
It’s about 2-3X more expensive so about the same token efficiency as 1017. I can see this being a good option for the US.
reply
kadoban 7 hours ago
Wow, that's pretty good.
reply
ygouzerh 2 hours ago
Interesting, I sent the same wine testing example to Claude Opus 5.5 medium, and it failed, where Inkling 2 Small succeed.
reply
ddxv 7 hours ago
This is amazing! Can't wait to trying this out. Also, crazy that I found this on LinkedIn with more upvotes and discussion than the HN thread has.
reply
Neywiny 6 hours ago
I feel like this is a dumb question, but why are we spending any effort on wine comparisons? Is there a way to get rid of experts on these to just be ones for code?
reply
XenophileJKO 4 hours ago
Just looking through the benchmarks, the model seems to be very high on visual/spatial capabilities. So I assumed they just tried some hard tasks on it and was surprised by wine identification and thought it was surprising that it could identify wines.
reply
kccqzy 6 hours ago
What if your coding project is related to wine? So you would want facts about wine to be inside the weights, not through web search.
reply
Neywiny 6 hours ago
If it was about wine, why would I want one with a training data cutoff? I'd much rather have one that can query a database about wine
reply
randomblock1 5 hours ago
It's not like they're training on that. That's just a good showcase of how the model is good at generalizing & understanding (not benchmaxxed). You might want something similar to these experts for tasks like detecting anomalies or discoloration or whatever.
reply
Neywiny 5 hours ago
Source they didn't train on it?
reply
alexandra_au 4 hours ago
Damn their last "Inkling Small" model was only 266B and now this is more than double.
reply
lostmsu 7 hours ago
> Small: 594 billion parameters

cries in GPU racks

reply
colingauvin 7 hours ago
You could probably run a Q2-Q3 with 2x DGX Sparks. So...$12k at today's prices. Plenty of folks are running DS 4.1 Flash with Strata and some GPU + bulk in system memory. Maybe more like $3k-$4k? But speeds come down quite a bit.
reply
jazzyjackson 7 hours ago
I don’t like it. Poor form to squat on an old companies name like that, one which has a rich legacy in AI. I know the trademark was cancelled so all I can say is I don’t like it.
reply
singpolyma3 7 hours ago
So basically comparable to DS4.1? But why bother to make something we already have?
reply
nullbio 29 minutes ago
I would hope that the American models aren't benchmaxxed to hell like all of the Chinese ones are.
reply
multisport 6 hours ago
Because its american.
reply
singpolyma3 6 hours ago
lol
reply
reasonableklout 6 hours ago
Sovereign open source AI is a real thing, lots of companies want to own their own intelligence but also don't trust the models coming out of China.
reply
singpolyma3 5 hours ago
Why would you trust anything coming out of USA?
reply
estearum 5 hours ago
The vast majority of users on this website wouldn't be trusting something coming out of the USA, they'd be trusting something in the USA.
reply
nozzlegear 4 hours ago
Do you mean to ask why non-American companies would trust anything coming out of the USA? Because American companies tend to have a lot of trust for other American companies.
reply
SamBam 5 hours ago
[dead]
reply
ycui7 5 hours ago
[dead]
reply
jackb4040 4 hours ago
[flagged]
reply