Living beyond the limits of survival: wood ants trapped in a gigantic pitfall (2016)
78 points by hitekker 4 hours ago | 27 comments

wowczarek 2 hours ago
Well I'll be.

At least two of the authors are also avid chiropterologists, with an understood penchant for bunkers and other such spaces.

One summer in my late teens I sat with two of them in an urban park in NW Poland drinking beer, watching bats getting caught in a net half-submerged in water near a bridge and engaging in impromptu comedy with passers-by asking questions like "good catch? any fish?". Good times.

Engaging in field research is a wonderfully rewarding experience, a great way to spend time, meet people and do something meaningful at the same time. If you've never done it - do it. There are plenty of volunteering opportunities - you don't need to be a scientist. Birding, insects, marine life, whatever. Citizen science is also great, but if you get a chance to work alongside scientists, it gets even better. 10/10 good walk, unspoilt.

reply
quibono 2 hours ago
I love this!

> A ‘colony’ of Formica polyctena was found in January 2013, during winter counts of hibernating bats in the underground bunker.

And all makes sense

reply
alexey-salmin 3 hours ago
> The ‘colony’ has evidently produced no offspring, which is due to low (though relatively stable) temperatures and scanty food in the bunker.

Isn't it due to the lack of the queen? Colony of worker ants is a dead end

reply
esaym 6 minutes ago
I think some acrobat ant colonies have more than one queen.
reply
donkey_brains 3 hours ago
They mentioned that a queen or brood ant might fall into the bunker occasionally but the low temperatures would prevent breeding in that case.
reply
dsr_ 23 minutes ago
I'm glad I don't think that ants have self-awareness, because this sounds like hell.
reply
varjag 4 hours ago
A unique accumulation of workers (‘colony’) of the wood ant Formica polyctena Först., trapped within an old bunker for storing nuclear weapons, is described. The source of the ‘colony’ is a large colony nesting outdoors, on top of the bunker. Individuals that have fallen down through a ventilation pipe are not able to find their way back to the mother nest.

The dictatorship of proletariat but for ants, and inside a Soviet bunker of course. Sometimes I see why people find the idea that there's no God incredulous.

reply
quibono 4 hours ago
> Two underground two-level ammunition bunkers, 300 metres apart (26 m × 42 m each), which constituted the core of the base and where nuclear weapons were kept, have survived (Sadowski 2011, Rutko 2015).

Interestingly this is a "Soviet" bunker in western Poland. A Warsaw Pact bunker?

Also, I didn't think that Soviet policy was to store nuclear weapons in Poland - not sure if this quote is accurate or if this was just more common than I had thought?

reply
m4rtink 4 hours ago
It was likely similar to the warhead storage bunkers in Czech Republic (or Czechoslovaki back then), most likely intended for tactical nuclear weapons, like Scuds or maybe for aircraft as well:

https://www.expats.cz/czech-news/article/top-secret-cold-war...

https://www.rferl.org/a/24993733.html

https://www.euronews.com/2021/07/18/czech-cold-war-depot-for...

Of course the Soviets (who were exclusively running and guarding those bunkers back then) never confirmed what they were used to or if they contained live nuclear weapons. But it is clear that this was the intended use case, given the storage conditions, the expens to build & run those as well as how heavily they were guarded.

reply
ahoka 60 minutes ago
Same in Hungary: https://worldwidepanorama.org/wwp1208/BanfalvyZoltan-5060.ht...

"This is a special storage facility, type Granit 2 (or 3), designed for A-bombs."

Not sure if it's true, but the article says these nukes were meant for Italy.

reply
quibono 3 hours ago
I find these bunkers fascinating. I've always wanted to explore one.

Amazing how much money was wasted on these only to be staffed for years and then abandoned.

reply
t-3 3 hours ago
Successful military spending always appears to be "wasted" if you think the point is to use weapons. War means that your defense strategy has failed, peace means that it has succeeded. Never having to use what was stored in those bunkers means that they served their purpose.
reply
dripdry45 3 hours ago
By this logic people can justify almost anything. I can say that we should’ve sent dinosaur clones to the moon because otherwise something bad is going to happen. Then we send the dinosaurs to the moon and nothing bad happens, and it justifies the action.

It’s the same insanity gun owners use justifying bringing weapons everywhere they go.

I simply don’t buy the argument, though I do see your point about deterrence

reply
bell-cot 36 minutes ago
Might you have heard the old saw "Any idiot can build a bridge that stands, but it takes an engineer to build a bridge that barely stands"?

Military spending is similar - you want security at the minimum cost.

Unfortunately, military conflicts (real and potential) have vastly more complexity and uncertainty than the gravity, wind, traffic loads, etc. that a bridge has to withstand. And even a nation's best experts (generally its senior military officers) generally have motives at odds with minimum-cost security for their nation.

reply
wffurr 2 hours ago
Si vis pacem para bellum.
reply
shilgapira 46 minutes ago
No snark intended, but if you see his point then you do seem to buy his argument
reply
sandworm101 2 hours ago
By "nuclear weapon" most people think of a bomb, but it can also mean the non-bomb portions of nuclear delivery systems such as rocket/missile bodies and aircraft. In times of rising conflict they could "forward-deploy" the warheads from Russia to be mated to rockets and such already in the field. So the peacetime "no nukes in Poland" policy can be true even though "nuclear weapons" were already waiting in bunkers there.

The west did basically the same thing. Not every "nuclear weapon bunker" at every American base actually held warheads.

reply
m4rtink 2 hours ago
In the Czechoslovak case those bunkers were definitely for the warheads - far too small for a whole Scud missile, air conditioned, etc. The delivery mechanisms were notionally conventional & are documented as stationed elsewhere.

It was in those bunkers where the warheads would be (were ?) stored in the time of crisis as a forward deployment.

reply
dghughes 19 minutes ago
The ants are two weeks away from going nuclear.
reply
tristramb 3 hours ago
Ant expert E.O.Wilson once said of communism: "Great idea. Wrong species"
reply
Arodex 2 hours ago
Funny you say that when literally a few stories away on HN first page, you have this:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50388122

reply
nickdothutton 3 hours ago
[narrator] This was not a story about ants.
reply
donkey_brains 3 hours ago
It’s definitely a metaphor for something, but I don’t know what.
reply
neuroticnews25 4 hours ago
Flat parts of the earthen mound and the floor of the adjacent spaces were carpeted with bodies of dead ants. Locally the deposits were a few centimetres thick. (...) the number of dead Formica polyctena workers probably amounted to about two million. The cemeteries comprised also remnants of other insects, most probably those caught by foragers of the free-living upper colony that had fallen down. Of other ants, only a head of the Leptothorax sp. worker was found.

"Ah yes, that small speck of chitin among 2 million other corpses is obviously a head of the Leptothorax sp. worker."

reply
donkey_brains 3 hours ago
I also found this part hilarious. It’s not even a needle in a haystack, more like one specific needle in a…big pile of needles, I guess. Except the needles are microscopic, fragile and fragmentary.
reply
ForHackernews 3 hours ago
Presumably entomologists are good at accurately identifying small bits of ants.
reply
ralfd 4 hours ago
Needless sensationalism: I didnt find the term “cannibalistic” on the source page.
reply