Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
60 points by thisisauserid 2 hours ago | 31 comments

wxce 22 minutes ago
It's insane how Google has dropped the ball almost completely with AI.

I literally don't care about their models anymore because I can't even try them without paying for them?

I already pay for the plus plan but whatever their latest model was, is locked for me. Or otherwise it's just not accessible for me.

If I try to add balance to my Google payment account, it shows me errors and is asking me to verify my identity through government documents.

---

Not to mention the extremely confusing terminology. "Flash", "Experimental". Why are most of your models either of those two? I don't get the confidence that your models are any good because of such names. Give me a normal reliable model!

Even if Google releases AGI tier models in the future, I'll always look for other models because Google clearly thinks their models are too good for any of us.

reply
ttul 16 minutes ago
AI Studio is legitimately the worst UX experience on the internet. For a company with unlimited cash and the ability to hire the best talent, I just don’t get it. Give nearly anyone else a few hours alone with that codebase and Opus-5.5 and it will be looking 1,000x better.
reply
jorl17 16 minutes ago
There have been months where we've paid 1500€ for my AI models, but I can't bother with Google's models because I literally don't know how to get them. Every time I look it up it looks incredibly cumbersome and confusing. It's not clear which models I get, if I can get them on my personal accounts or need the work account. It's just too confusing.

I am a Google Workspace customer by the way (have multiple accounts, actually!).

Google must really not care about me as a customer, and instead only care about the enterprise.

reply
sebzim4500 12 minutes ago
The only sane way is to do it through openrouter. I spent hours trying to figure out how to use one of their two competing APIs that expose the models natively, it ended up being a waste of time.
reply
shooker435 13 minutes ago
It's confusing for enterprises, too. Believe it or not, the cloud sales team recommends hiring partners to set up basic auth and "landing zones" for the APIs.
reply
dataflow 4 minutes ago
[delayed]
reply
Drunkfoowl 18 minutes ago
[dead]
reply
collabs 8 minutes ago
A simple observation I have

> https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-uniblog-publish-prod/med...

Text from the first paragraph on the page says

> Today, we’re rolling out Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash, and making it generally available across the Gemini API and Gemini for business. Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash introduces native 15-second video creation, multi-turn conversational editing capabilities, and enhanced reference following. We have dropped the price 30% from Gemini Omni 1.1 making it available at $0.07 per second for 720p video.

Focus on this part

> We have dropped the price 30%

The text to speech audio says

> We have dropped the price 3%

reply
liveoneggs 6 minutes ago
They built a youtube-immolation machine - but to what end?
reply
armcat 7 minutes ago
Completely random, but I was inspecting the source code for their Omni 1.2 Flash web page, and there are insane amount of newlines. There are seven newlines between the first line and the DOCTYPE. There are huge amount of newlines between each section. What did they use to generate this website?
reply
Willingham 17 minutes ago
The rollout is so confusing. Going straight to the Gemini app and asking when I can use this model gets me vague and contradicting answers. Ultimately it sounds like the Vids rollout will take 1-3 days, and you can go to vids.new on desktop to see if you’ve won the lottery and have it available now, apparently on any free Google account. Business accounts can use it too. Meanwhile the Gemini app is getting it on paid plans, but with different video length limits and no clear rollout timeline. If you pay for the API, it’s available now apparently.

Why is this so difficult to figure out?

reply
jcelerier 9 minutes ago
I opened ai studio and i see it popping up, on a normal account: https://aistudio.google.com/prompts/new_chat?model=gemini-om...
reply
WarmWash 8 minutes ago
https://flow.google.com/ is where most people would use the model. You get credits with your monthly sub that you can spend on flow.
reply
poilcn 22 minutes ago
Somewhere in the middle of the video it would suddenly scroll one screen back, happens with all videos on the page, eh
reply
hulkmusic 8 minutes ago
When playback ends on one of the videos, the page jumps back to that video for some reason. I saw this too when I had multiple videos playing at once and the earlier clip on the page finished while watching another one lower on the page.
reply
4pkjai 20 minutes ago
noticed that too
reply
tabbiee 42 minutes ago
Price is $1.50 in Input and $9.00/$12.00 (text/video) in Output per 1M tokens
reply
thisisauserid 40 minutes ago
Extending an exiting video by 15 seconds is pretty nuts.
reply
dude250711 37 minutes ago
That is sad... I tried to guess and ignore AI videos (created to be deliberately misleading as "realistic") by length, but I guess that time is over now.
reply
mikelopez 6 minutes ago
I don't trust Google on AI. They should do an spin off if they want to be relevant in AI.
reply
amunozo 44 seconds ago
DeepMind would be a good name for it!
reply
bmiekre 9 minutes ago
Why do we need this?
reply
jonkrone 48 minutes ago
Wait, I thought we were on Gemini 4?
reply
pyjarrett 5 minutes ago
It would be incredibly helpful to me if AI model names followed cars.

I'm not scratching my head about a "2025 Corolla." Windows 95 and 2000 had this built in, but then they lost it.

I'd prefer it was called Omni 2026.2 instead. It embeds a date and model and would package it as a product for on-premise or local hosting. It'd be easier to sell to the bean counters in the future: "We're running Omni 2026.2, we want to upgrade to Omni 2028."

reply
seunosewa 47 minutes ago
Omni is a video model.
reply
rdtsc 27 minutes ago
But it still starts with “Gemini”. It would be better if they called it Gemini Omni 4, 4.1 etc. Otherwise call it just Omni 1.2 and drop the Gemini prefix.
reply
LtdJorge 44 minutes ago
Which, from a naming standpoint, doesn't make any sense
reply
brookst 45 minutes ago
It’s still bad versioning and will confuse people.
reply
iruoy 43 minutes ago
At least this one is available immediately.
reply
NitpickLawyer 45 minutes ago
Waiting for someone to test it with "~~A pelican~~Will Smith eating pasta while riding a bicycle" or something...
reply
sirmike_ 38 minutes ago
it’s a shame that Google/Gemini decided to restrict and fuck other adventurous yet extremely gracious paying customers; who were excited at the prospect of not being locked in to two obnoxious companies.

oh well, I guess we’ll just have to take that enthusiasm and roll it over to all the open weights on providers like fireworks.ai. or others.

i’m so happy I got in early and paid for $200 a month for shit ass Opus 4.6 and sonnet 4.6 and being locked into the absolutely limited Gemini 3.8 flash.

reply
azan_ 29 minutes ago
> who were excited at the prospect of not being locked in to two obnoxious companies.

Is being locked in to three obnoxious companies that much better?

reply