Person of Interest
102 points by krthr 3 hours ago | 66 comments

andreapaiola 26 seconds ago
Dark Angel Fringe LOST Halt and Catch Fire

... And you're good...

reply
randallsquared 13 minutes ago
The primary science fiction quality of the show is that something like that could have been done as early as it was said to have been. At the time, that part of it seemed almost completely impossible. With subsequent developments, it now only seems implausible. Wild.
reply
sigmoid10 7 minutes ago
To me the wildest part was always that this originally aired almost 2 full years before Snowden. The premise that the government gave itself permission to read and analyze all digital traffic after 9/11 was more conspiracy than science fiction back then, but Snowden showed that basically everything the show claimed (except for the artificial superintelligence doing the analysis) was actually true.
reply
microflash 17 minutes ago
Pleasantly surprised to see this here. One of the most memorable shows that I watched ages ago. It was strong at the beginning but kind of dragged on in later seasons. Still very nice to binge.

In case you’re looking for some more shows related to AI, Cupertino by Robert King and Michelle King is currently airing and is pretty entertaining.

reply
jordz 2 hours ago
I absolutely loved this show, and to be honest a rewatch is needed. I won’t make any reference to specifics due to spoilers. Would recommend.
reply
DavidPiper 19 minutes ago
Same! It gets more real with every rewatch (last year most recently for me).

It's kind of refreshing to watch a series from before the streaming/miniseries format was really a thing. It's too long to be a miniseries, but not long enough to drag, or be off-putting if you want to watch the whole thing.

If you haven't seen it and you're on the fence, watch it. It's worth it. (Or you'll know by Episode 3 if it's not for you.)

reply
freakynit 2 hours ago
This is my yearly bing-watch show. Highly recommended.

Also, with all AI developments happening since past few years, the show has started to feel like a documentary.

reply
microtonal 47 minutes ago
We should rewatch it too. We watched it a long time ago and we both thoroughly enjoyed it (tech nerd and not).
reply
seb1204 2 hours ago
I re-watched it earlier in the year. Such a great show.
reply
amelius 2 hours ago
Yes, great show!
reply
jan_m_savage 53 minutes ago
POI is a great show also because of the two main characters, the geek and his execution-man, both accomplished actors.

One of my most fav TV Serials to have come out of the West.

reply
povik 3 minutes ago
It's a buddy comedy
reply
404mm 8 minutes ago
Caviezel did a decent job in the show (for what it was) but once you see/hear him speak his mind outside of the industry, it ruins it for you.
reply
drkleiner 47 minutes ago
Two main characters essentially combine into Batman. Maybe Finch is a bit of Alfred as well
reply
kshri24 34 minutes ago
Creator of the show is Chris Nolan's brother. That should tell you everything (including the choice of John Reese / Jim Caviezel, who resembles Christian Bale not just in looks but acting too)
reply
emil-lp 44 minutes ago
And the woman (from buffy) (don't recall her name).

And of course Elias

reply
le-mark 5 minutes ago
I really liked this show. Ultimately it was very formulaic and could have done a lot more with the concepts it revealed. It painted a future where ai (along with total surveillance) could benefit people in deeply meaningful ways; matchmaker, fulfilling work and daily task, coordination, purpose and guidance. And the dangers of all those used for control.
reply
doginasuit 31 minutes ago
Person of Interest is a relentlessly silly show, although you wouldn't necessarily pick up on it at first. It leans into it more with each season until that's all there is. I still enjoyed it, it is pretty self aware. I would not watch it with the idea that it has any relevance to anything.
reply
Geezus_42 6 minutes ago
That's how most good shows used to be. Start serious, maybe a bit goofy, then by the end everything has gone way off the rails.
reply
nashashmi 2 hours ago
Suggested this rewatch in the age of AI to my wife who was oblivious to it. Jonathan Nolan did a tremendous job with this. The concepts it showed were theoretical back in the old days. Now some are real. Some have passed. Like AI fixing code and closing loopholes. Like too much unchecked power in a few hands. Some have yet to come to pass. Like terrorists. Like crime neutralizing machines. Like misalignments. Like power limits. Like Rogue AI. Like self preserving AI. Like servants to an AI. Like God mode.
reply
Geezus_42 5 minutes ago
> Like crime neutralizing machines. > Like Rogue AI.

Nightmares.

reply
swiftcoder 2 hours ago
I also started watching this for the first time this summer, and it holds up remarkably well
reply
totetsu 18 minutes ago
looking at my apple social graph on my hdd as seen here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50403097

Im feeing the premis of this show is not so far off..

reply
Bl4cksmith 2 hours ago
One of the most interesting details I've found to be are the scenes that show why AI system alignment is difficult
reply
comrade1234 2 hours ago
I enjoyed this show a lot and I was looking forward to westworld as a continuation of the story - I wanted to see what Nolan would do with the story when the AIs are corporeal, but ultimately westworld was a disappointment, spending too much of the story in the fantasy world.
reply
cluckindan 2 hours ago
Did you watch all four seasons?
reply
sam_lowry_ 50 minutes ago
Should have stopped at 1st.
reply
croes 34 minutes ago
I liked the more sci-fi heavy later seasons
reply
jrm4 2 hours ago
What?

Just your last clause was a weird one, if you do watch all four seasons. This is a tiny bit of a spoiler, but the problem was closely related to what you say. They didn't spend much time AT all in the "transition" to an AI infested world, but instead, well, skipped A LOT.

reply
yewenjie 2 hours ago
I don't what HN's opinion of Mr. Robot is, but some of you will definitely like it.

It's not really about hacking, but it depicted technology and hacking in an extraordinarily level of correctness.

reply
matsemann 2 hours ago
I absolutely can't stand shows where the protagonist has to deal with their own self inflicted issues due to drugs. Maybe because I'm sheltered, or maybe it's a bigger issue in the US than where I live, but I just can't relate at all, and just get annoyed that it's used to add conflicts to a story where I just feels it sidetracks. Like, just get on with it.

As an aside, same with cheating in movies/series. While it's probably more common than I know it to be where I live, it possibly cannot be as ubiquitous as American medias (and social medias) make it out to be. Again, just an annoyance detracting from the story, and again can't relate. I had to quit "Making a Murderer" over it. At some point in season two or something, absolutely everyone in the main cast were involved in cheating. All the students, the teacher, a policeman, some lawyers. Like, what the hell.

Sorry about the rant. But I really really wanted to like Mr Robot. But having tried to get into it twice I'm a bit miffed.

reply
stalfie 23 minutes ago
It is arguably a very uninspired literary device to set up conflicts, but it is unfortunately not exactly unrealistic. Estimates are that more than a third of western society, probably closer to half, meet the DSM-5 criteria for substance use disorder at some point in their lives. Roughly a little less than a third will cheat on their partner during their lifetime, closer to half will have their partner cheat on them. These numbers are after a rough fact check courtesy of whatever Gemini model is in Google search, my own rough sense and knowledge of the literature is just that it's very common.

Uninspired as they might be as literary devices, drug abuse and cheating are common themes in actual human existence.

reply
detourdog 6 minutes ago
Not trying to normalize usage in anyway. I just wonder if a behavior is well represented in a society is it still a disorder?

The behavior while under the influence should get labeled but the usage might be normal. People being angry or not taking responsibility deserves a label from the DSM. If a large population is ingesting things this might be normal.

reply
pmlnr 2 hours ago
The first episode is genius.

Then it becomes a completely different show.

So I love the first episode, and I was left really empty in the later seasons. It's definitely not for me, but I hold on to it believing it'll be different. It wasn't.

See also the very last episode of Ragnarok (Netflix), which absolutely trashes the whole show.

reply
jrm4 2 hours ago
Hehe, it kind of reminds me of an extreme (classic) Law and Order in that regard, but for hacking/tech.

Wildly unrealistic facts and how people are, like the janitor who finds eight bodies in a cellar talking to the cops like it happens everyday, but also gets nearly every tiny bit of New York law technically correct.

reply
gnfargbl 29 minutes ago
Why is this blog post written in two slightly different but semantically equivalent ways, with a tearline between the two versions?

I feel like I'm being A/B tested by a broken AI.

reply
ACS_Solver 25 minutes ago
It's written in English first, with a Spanish version after. Sounds like you have some auto-translation thing going in the browser.
reply
oskarpearson 25 minutes ago
They are in two different languages. Have you got some sort of auto-translate feature enabled in your browser, perhaps?
reply
gnfargbl 24 minutes ago
Ha! It was indeed auto-translate. Thank you; I thought I was losing my mind for a moment there. Apparently I'm so used to every web page being covered in popups and banners that my brain filters them entirely.
reply
bilsbie 55 minutes ago
This show is the epitome of “you have to watch a few seasons before it gets good”. (Which if you think about it is an absurd thing to tell someone. Ie Invest 24 hours of your time into this show before you decide)

When I watched it I thought the privacy model the AI used was dumb but it kind of makes some sense.

reply
V__ 32 minutes ago
It starts as a case-of-the-week type of show with a bit of AI backstory before it changes in the later season to a more overarching plot. I think this is one of the reasons it became so good, because it eased you in.
reply
emil-lp 43 minutes ago
I thought it was good from the first episode!
reply
Semaphor 2 hours ago
Loved that show when it came out. Rewatched it with my wife a few years ago, still great.
reply
s_u_d_o 2 hours ago
Would I enjoy watching it for the first-time today? Or I should’ve watched it before, and re-watch it now to have this feeling/realization?
reply
freakynit 2 hours ago
You'll feel more at home watching it now, than a few years back, before all the AI developments that have happened in past few years.

It'll be eerily more relatable now. This show was way ahead of it's time, and damn accurate.

reply
radu_floricica 2 hours ago
This. It sounds unlikely, but it's exactly like this. All the stuff that was supposed to be somewhat science fiction back then, now you just nod and say "makes perfect sense".
reply
Dreami 23 minutes ago
I watched it for the first time starting this year. And at some point you realize: wait this part was Sci-fi when the show came out and now we have it, but many use it to just alter a recipe or something
reply
BrentOzar 2 hours ago
You'd definitely enjoy watching it for the first time today, but note the filming & release dates when you're watching. It's eerie how prescient a lot of it is.
reply
noir_lord 2 hours ago
Worth watching, first season is good after that it’s great.

Second only to Justified on my list of “consistently brilliant across entire run”.

There are parts of PoI that stick with you long after the show.

Not saying which because spoilers, it’s one of those shows that is better for knowing little about it before watching.

reply
e12e 2 hours ago
I'm currently rewatching Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles and Person of Interest - I think both stand up surprisingly well.
reply
Brajeshwar 2 hours ago
Rewatched a few times. Unfortunately, around the end seasons, it became predictable and “extended”. There are quite a few screens on their computer that were borrowed from unsuspecting sources — such as the screens from the App, DaisyDisk.

https://x.com/brajeshwar/status/1733390176112800037

reply
nikosklms 35 minutes ago
Reese and Finch carried that entire show. The way their dynamic shifted over the first two seasons was easily the best part of the run lmao
reply
dave7 2 hours ago
Incredibly prescient show, I loved it at the time and it's definitely worthy of a rewatch soon.

> I also find it pretty crazy and, frankly, a little sad to think that something like the Machine, which seemed like pure science fiction at the time, isn't all that far from our reality today.

Yeah. "You are being watched. The govt. has a secret system - a machine - that spies on you every hour of every day". The opening words from the show's title sequence - Jumped straight to mind after the revelations of Microsoft building "a machine" for the IDF on Azure not so long ago.

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/06/microsoft-isra...

reply
2Gkashmiri 46 minutes ago
It's one of those gems in the wild.

If there is a show that I can rewatch, it's this.

I am more interested in how the philosophy of the show, how the ethics tie into real world implications.

We talk about open source licenses in a grand manner which some might say " why does it matter" but this show shows how the philosophical decisions tie into overall ideas and what it can do.

reply
brador 2 hours ago
You don’t want a free internet, you want a nice internet with nice people who can argue but don’t insult each other too harshly.

I still remember the weird shock I felt the first time I saw “kys” as a reply and looked it up. Something changed that day. Wasn’t even to me.

reply
tosh 2 hours ago
great show, if you haven't watched it yet
reply
44mkultra69 2 hours ago
anybody else getting annoyed by DNS hijackers and wall-e gardeners who feel the need to edit shows you watched in the past with AI and DLSS?
reply
r_lee 2 hours ago
DNS hijackers editing shows you watched?

what do you mean exactly?

reply
gib444 56 minutes ago
Sail on the high seas!
reply
DonHopkins 2 hours ago
Not annoyed at all! I just finished re-watching Person of Interest about a week ago.

In the new AI DLSS version currently on Netflix, Bear is an obedient German Shephard with a dense sable coat of golden tan and reddish brown with black-tipped hairs, darker shading along his neck and shoulders, a broad black muzzle and eye mask, dark upright ears, and a thick neck ruff.

But the first time I watched Person of Interest when it was originally broadcast in 2011, Bear was a cantankerous enormous orange Maine Coon with a long, shaggy ginger coat, darker marmalade tabby stripes, a pale cream chin and chest, a heavy neck ruff, tufted ears and paws, a broad square muzzle, and a luxuriant plumed tail.

I think the later AI version of Bear as a German Shephard was much better. The original real life Maine Coone version of Bear gave off strong Garfield vibes, and that just didn't fit into the plot as well as the new AI generated German Shephard version.

It was flawless slopless AI, that actually contributed to the coherence of the plot and overall believability. Walking an orange Maine Coone around the streets of New York on a leash and attacking criminals on command was just weird for a central character like Bear. I don't know what they were thinking! Netflix was right to adjust it.

reply
swed420 39 minutes ago
I had no idea this was a thing, but I shouldn't be surprised.

Maybe some people like these alterations, but others of us would prefer to have the option of the original work.

I'm glad I was able to find this show unaltered on internet archive before it was presumably yanked.

reply
dublinben 30 minutes ago
They're joking. I don't know what OP is going on about. The character of Bear was always a dog, not a large cat.
reply
swed420 25 minutes ago
Thank fuck
reply
DonHopkins 25 minutes ago
It seemed prudent to play along and humor a guy whose handle is 44mkultra69.

To celebrate Bob Dylan meeting the Pope, my favorite curiously specific retroactive confabulation I want to recreate with AI is the episode of the Muppet Show with Bob Dylan and The Band playing Too Much of Nothing from the Basement Tapes, in a basement with the full hippie muppet entourage "Dr. Teeth and the Electric Mayhem", including Animal, Janice, Floyd Pepper, Dr. Teeth, Zoot, and Lips.

https://muppet.fandom.com/wiki/Dr._Teeth_and_the_Electric_Ma...

If only it were real, it would have rivaled the actual 1978 episode with Alice Cooper and the monster backing band "The Vile Bunch", including Chopped Liver, Silver Beak, Flower-Eating Monster, a guitarist and a drummer.

https://muppet.fandom.com/wiki/The_Vile_Bunch

Alice Cooper & The Muppets - "Welcome To My Nightmare"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iz0lXNNkqac

The Muppet Show - 307: Alice Cooper - Backstage #1 (1978)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYprswSfMGk

Muppet Songs: Alice Cooper - You and Me

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDgNNbyoWdk

Sam the Eagle versus Alice Cooper (this is obviously where Trump plagerized his nickname and insults for James Talarico):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNYI3iINXrQ

Sam the Eagle> Mister Cooper!

Alice Coooper> Yes?

Sam the Eagle> Ahem. Let me come right to the point. You sir, are a demented, sick, degenerate, barbaric, naighty Freako!

Alice Cooper> Why thank you!

Sam the Eagle> Freakos one, civilization zero.

reply
vandenthieren 2 hours ago
[dead]
reply